0
What else can I help you with?
Is a jury trial better than a bench trial?
There can be no definite answer to this question. Suffice it to say, that the greater or more serious the offense, therefore the harsher the possible penalty, the better odds would tend to favor a jury trial. Many attorneys advise their clients that, if they are actually innocent, they should choose trial by judge, because a judge is presumed to actually understand and take serious the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt." Likewise, judges are less likely to be confused or dazzled by effective advocacy, meaning they are less likely to acquit a guilty person. Jurors, however, are more likely to acquit a guilty defendant (than is a judge), and thus are a better choice for a defendant who is actually (or likely) guilty. Overall, however, juries are more likely to convict a defendant, regardless of actual guilt.
Is a bench trial for armed robbery better than a jury trial?
It depends on the case. If it is a case where the defendant is likable and there aren't many technical legal issues at hand, or the judge is fairly harsh, a jury trial would be better. If it is a case where legal technicalities are a big issue, or the judge is fairly defense friendly, or the defendant is particularly scary to the general public, you probably want a bench trial. You should discuss the pros and cons with your attorney. He/she will have a better grasp on the law at issue, the jury pool in the area, and the reputation of the judge.
How can a person be convicted if the people that committed the crime said that someone else did it?
Perhaps the evidence that was submitted at trial convinced the judge and/or jury of your guilt rather than the statement of the convicted perpetrator (who they may believe was just trying to get his accomplice off the hook).
Does a person body temperature is higher than a dog?
Dogs have a higher blood temperature than humans
Who is higher than a federal judge?
The Chief Justice of the United States (Supreme Court)has the most authority in Judicial Branch of government, but he is also a federal judge.
What is a court hearing in which probable cause is reviewed?
Probable cause is determined during a preliminary hearing. During this hearing, the judge listens to the prosecution's evidence and decides if there is enough to justify bringing the case to trial.?æA judicial hearing in which testimony is given and the judge rules on whether "probable cause" existed for the original arrest of the defendant.
How does a judge decides jury or non jury?
the judge doesn't decide jury or non jury the defendant (person being sued) can decide to have a jury in any civil case (one person suing another) involving more than $25, or in any criminal case (the government vs a person). also, in some criminal cases (like murder) they have to have a jury trial.
Why does the judge sit higher than everyone else?
The judge sits higher than everyone else in a courtroom to symbolize authority and impartiality. This elevated position allows the judge to have a clear view of all participants, reinforcing the perception of fairness and control over the proceedings. Additionally, it serves as a visual reminder of the rule of law and the serious nature of the judicial process.
Was it a fair trial in inherit the wind?
"Inherit the Wind" is a fictionalized account of the Scopes Monkey Trial, where John Scopes was found guilty of teaching evolution. Many believe it was not a fair trial as the judge restricted the defense's arguments and favored the prosecution. The trial was heavily influenced by public opinion and political agendas rather than a pursuit of justice.
Who is the most important person of the judicial branch?
In the United States, the nine members of the US Supreme Court would be regarded as being the most important as they have the role of interpreting how the Constitution may be expressed in law. In Scotland, it would be the Attorney General, who is the chief judge.
What is different about the trial of an impeached president?
The trial of an impeached president is different from a regular criminal trial in several ways. Firstly, it is conducted by the Senate rather than the judiciary branch. Secondly, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over the trial. Lastly, the trial focuses on determining whether the president is guilty of "high crimes and misdemeanors" as defined by the Constitution, rather than determining guilt or innocence of a specific crime.
What does it mean by their fruit you should know them?
It means that you should judge a person by their behavior rather than by their words or appearance.
