answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is the process of peer review an important part of scientific communication?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the process used to determine whether experimental results should be published in scientific journals?

peer-review process


Why is peer review important when publishing experimental results?

peer review makes the result more reliable


When was The Communication Review created?

The Communication Review was created in 1995.


How often should communication channels be reviewed and why is a review process necessary?

to improve a good communication and attempt the objective of the organisation and keep the credibility of the organisation


What of the following is the goal of the peer review process?

A fair assessment of an expierememt


Which process must occur in order for the scientific community to be ensured that no bias exists in the experiment?

Peer Review.


Peer review is more important than the presentation of the scientific paper because?

fu science


What is it call when a scientists examine how well the other scientists follow the scientific method?

A Peer Review


What is improved by the process of peer review?

The reliability of a scientific presentation


Before it is published in a scientific journal, a paper must pass through the peer review process. Which of the following is a benefit of this practice?

a scientific paper is a reliable source of information - apex


What is the difference between reviewing a scientific paper in a conference and submitting a paper during the peer review process?

In a conference, a group of scientists from the same field reviews the paper. In a peer review, members from other fields review the paper.


What is it called when scientists carefully examine a new result by someone else in their field of study.?

The process is called peer review. It is defined as an evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field.