Because the Roman numerals MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII add up to 1999 and by placing I to the left and right hand sides of these numerals they can be simplified into IMM (2000-1). The numerals MCMXCIX in fact represent M-C+M-X+C-I+X which when simplified leaves -I+M+M = IMM (2000-1). Numerical values: M=1000, D=500, C=100, L=50, X=10, V=5 and I=1. David Gambell, Merseyside, England. Conventionally accept wisdom tells us that MCMXCIX (1000 + 900 + 90 +9) and MCMXCVIIII (1000 + 900 + 90 + 5 + 4) both mean 1999, although the former is more popular as it is shorter. The alternative mentioned above, IMM is incorrect on two counts. According to the website Algebra.com Roman numerals read from left to right and always start with the highest value numeral, as I (1) is patently less than MM (2000) IMM is clearly wrong. Also while I may preceed V or X it should not be placed in front of any higher value numerals.
The Roman numerals mdcccclxxxxviiii or MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII (they both have the same numerical value but the upper case version is more preferable) converted into Arabic numerals are 1999.While 1999 could theoretically be written as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII the more widely accepted form of the number would be MCMXCIX. Shorter is better!
February XIIII MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII or Feb. IXV IMM and it is not Feb. XIV MCMXCIX the way you might have expected it to be.
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX
In today's notation of Roman numerals: II-XXI-MCMXCIX But during the Roman era the Romans themselves would have worked out the equivalent of 1999 on an abacus counting device as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and probably simplified it to IMM (2000-1 = 1999) in written form.
1999In today's terms MCMXCIX are the Roman numerals for 1999But the Romans themselves would have probably calculated 1999 on an abacus counting device as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and simply wrote it out as IMM (-1+2000 = 1999)Today's rules governing the Roman numeral system were introduced during the Middle Ages but that was centuries after the decline of the Roman Empire.
The Roman numerals mdcccclxxxxviiii or MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII (they both have the same numerical value but the upper case version is more preferable) converted into Arabic numerals are 1999.While 1999 could theoretically be written as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII the more widely accepted form of the number would be MCMXCIX. Shorter is better!
February XIIII MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII or Feb. IXV IMM and it is not Feb. XIV MCMXCIX the way you might have expected it to be.
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX
In today's notation of Roman numerals: II-XXI-MCMXCIX But during the Roman era the Romans themselves would have worked out the equivalent of 1999 on an abacus counting device as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and probably simplified it to IMM (2000-1 = 1999) in written form.
In today's terms 1999 and 1776 expressed in Roman numerals are MCMXCIX and MDCCLXXVI respectively. To find the difference of these numerals is almost impossible because of the way that 1999 is expressed despite the fact that 1776 is correct. But the Romans would have probably expressed these numbers in the following manner IMM and MDCCLXXVI. IMM is a simplification of MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII So: MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII - MDCCLXXVI = CCXXIII (223) by cancelling out the numerals. Check: MDCCLXXVI + CCXXIII = MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII = IMM when simplified The way we work out Roman numerals today is different in the way that the Romans actually did themselves because the rules governing the Roman numeral system were changed in the Middle Ages. Presumably to make it easier to convert Roman numerals into Hindu-Arabic numerals that were gradually being introduced into Western Europe.
MCMXCIX
1999In today's terms MCMXCIX are the Roman numerals for 1999But the Romans themselves would have probably calculated 1999 on an abacus counting device as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and simply wrote it out as IMM (-1+2000 = 1999)Today's rules governing the Roman numeral system were introduced during the Middle Ages but that was centuries after the decline of the Roman Empire.
Because the subtractive element of Roman numerals is too difficult to grasp, even for math tutors. For example, the equivalent of 1999 is now considered to be MCMXCIX in Roman numerals but the ancient Romans would have worked it out on an abacus counting device as MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII (1999) and then probably abridged it to IMM (2000-1) in written format.
it would be november,MCMXCIX
The Roman or Latin numerals for 1776 and 223 are MDCCLXXVI and CCXXIII respectively. Therefore in accordance with today's rules governing the Roman numeral system they add up to MCMXCIX (1999). But during the Roman era these numerals would have been calculated on an abacus counting device as:- MDCCLXXVI + CCXXIII = MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and probably have been simplified to IMM (-1+2000 = 1999) in written form. The reason why MCMXCIX is chosen instead of IMM is presumably to make it easier to convert them into Hindu-Arabic numerals and vice versa.
15th November, 1999 is XV. XI. MCMXCIX in Roman numerals.
The Roman numerals for 07-01-1999 are VII-I-MCMXCIX.