If you think about it, it makes sense. Stars with more mass will be hotter in the center, because the center will be under more pressure. A hotter center means that nuclear reactions will proceed more quickly, and thus produce more radiation. This radiation eventually works its way to the surface of the star, so the surface of a more-massive star will be hotter. Hotter surfaces radiate more energy, and thus appear brighter.
Of course, there are other variables, such as chemical composition, involved, so the mass-luminosity relation is only approximate. And other physical considerations make some stars variable, sometimes over a large range in luminosity.
There are also special cases, such as white dwarfs, for which there is an entirely different relationship between mass and luminosity than that which holds for "normal" stars.
Main sequence stars
There's no single answer, since luminosity depends not only of mass but stage and temperature. However, most 0.1 Solar mass stars are going to be red dwarfs, so consider Wolf 359, a nearby star, as an example. It's about 0.09 Solar mass and its luminosity varies from about 0.0009 to 0.0011.
As mass increases It increases the surface temperature , luminosity, and radius.
It's Mass
Luminosity depends directly on mass because more massive main-sequence stars do not need to graviationally contract as far to reach fusion temperatures, and so they have a larger volume and contain a much larger amount of light energy, which diffuses out and generates a higher luminosity, very roughly in proportion to the higher volume.
The mass/luminosity relation is important because it can be used to find the distance to binary systems which are too far for normal parallax measurements.
Main sequence stars
It's luminosity,motion and mass.
How massive it is and its luminosity (the mass and luminosity correlate with each other with most stars, mainly the main sequence stars). The more mass a star has, the shorter its lifespan.
There's no single answer, since luminosity depends not only of mass but stage and temperature. However, most 0.1 Solar mass stars are going to be red dwarfs, so consider Wolf 359, a nearby star, as an example. It's about 0.09 Solar mass and its luminosity varies from about 0.0009 to 0.0011.
it depends on the mass of the star.
He applied the period-luminosity relation to Cepheid variables.
Mass and gravity are directly connected, and luminosity is closely related to mass.
luminosity and temperature depend on their size but also on their mass
As mass increases It increases the surface temperature , luminosity, and radius.
The greatest lover in Kansas is Jory Swogger
That is an oddly phrased question. If you're looking for the mass to luminosity relationship, it's generally L = M^3.5. But your question asks for the mass to light ratio. I'm not sure what the "light" part is referring to. But as you are given the luminosity, and the mass, perhaps you mean the ratio between those two quantities? Then you just do some division to create a ratio...