Want this question answered?
I accept the modern theory of evolution by natural selection. You can not just on a whim put forth a scientific theory. I suggest you access a good dictionary. The scientific meaning of " theory " is generally the primary meaning.
Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection is what you are trying to talk about. When someone says " evolution is just a theory " they are using the vulgar, common sense of the word theory. They mean guess, hunch and the like. The theory of evolution by natural selection is in the scientific sense of the word theory, which means a body of explanatory work supported by myriad lines of converging evidence that has been tested rigouusly and replicated often. Any good dictionary uses this scientific meaning of theory as the primary meaning of the word.
evolution is falts
The evolutionist claimed that the appendix was not a useful organ that came from a evolution phase before the human kind. Now, Duke University immunologist William Parker and his colleagues have proposed a theory: that it's a safe house for the helpful bacteria in our gut. They've found that the appendix is especially rich in these good bacteria. And the organ's thin, narrow shape may shut out harmful infections. So this is another fail in the evolution theory.
Being a theory, evolution (or rather "natural selection") is neither "true" nor "false". A theory is put forward as a possible explanation for a phenomenon that can be observed but not easily explained. There are many "facts" that are offered as evidence of "natural selection" being a good explanation for the huge variety of life on Earth and for the fact that, undoubtedly, species appeared and disappeared over the course of many millions of years, but not everyone is convinced by such "facts". There are other, alternative theories, such as creationism, lamarkism, or even extra-terrestrial intervention, but I'm afraid they're even less convincing than natural selection.
Evolution is an observed and observable fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains many things about evolution. The theory generates testable hypothesis, as any good theory does. Remember, theory is the highest concept in science.
I accept the modern theory of evolution by natural selection. You can not just on a whim put forth a scientific theory. I suggest you access a good dictionary. The scientific meaning of " theory " is generally the primary meaning.
Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection is what you are trying to talk about. When someone says " evolution is just a theory " they are using the vulgar, common sense of the word theory. They mean guess, hunch and the like. The theory of evolution by natural selection is in the scientific sense of the word theory, which means a body of explanatory work supported by myriad lines of converging evidence that has been tested rigouusly and replicated often. Any good dictionary uses this scientific meaning of theory as the primary meaning of the word.
Sorry we do not know what you mean by "arument", "thed" and "eropean".
The theory of evolution by natural selection explains how adaptive change may lead to speciation,\. As any good scientific theory it explains much but not everything. I seriously doubt, except in an ultimate sense, that you can explain why Gothic literature is now popular with evolutionary theory.
The vulgar meaning of theory is that one " guesses ", or just has an idea over a cup of coffee. The scientific meaning, which is the primary meaning in any good dictionary, is that theory is basically an explanation of phenomenon,( observation, fact, law, ) and this is logically consistent internally and supported by many lines of converging evidence. Simply put, the theory of evolution by natural selection is the cornerstone of biology. Biology would be an exercise in natural history " stamp collecting " is not for the theory of evolution by natural selection explaining so much ( not everything ) about evolution.
prity much sumed up is that if you have good genes you survive and if you have bad genes you don't.
Human evolution can be explained partially by the Wallace-Darwin theory of evolution via natural selection. Many of our outside characteristics can be explained in that way. However many other 'higher' human characteristics cannot be explained by that theory. Altruism (i.e. risking your own life to do good to an enemy of your without expecting any benefit at all) is the achilee's heel of Wallace-Darwin theory of evolution. The full explanation is not yet found...
Scientists do not prove things but the theory of evolution by natural selection has over 150 years of evidence supporting it and is considered a very certain theory and quite beyond reasonable doubt. As well accepted as the theory of gravity, atomic theory and the heliocentric theory. I suggest you review the primary meaning of scientific theory in a good dictionary.
The second argument which was against the ESA. It was written by Peyton knight he had a lot of statistics and numbers in his argument and the other guy Bob Davison just talked about what a good program it is and how it is helping. He wasn't as specific.
Evolution is an observed and observable fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains many things about evolution. The theory generates testable hypothesis, as any good theory does. Remember, theory is the highest concept in science.
It is a theory only, Facts are provable and repeatable. Evolution is nether provable nor repeatable. It is not a very good theory either, since it makes claims that go against proven laws of nature, such as the law of entropy which states that things go from order to disorder and not the reverse from disorder to order. This is an observable law in the everyday world around us and in the test tube. Things only go from disorder to order when acted upon by an outside force. Life (order) from chaos (disorder) without an outside force or intelligent design has never been proven to be a fact. Evolution is a religious cult pure and simple.