coal has to be burned in order to gain energy, whereas waste can be fermented at 35 oC to give its energy over an extended amount of time.
Note that the question is biased!
Burning biomass is considered better than burning oil or coal because biomass is a renewable energy source that can be produced sustainably, whereas oil and coal are fossil fuels that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Additionally, burning biomass can help reduce waste by using organic materials that would otherwise be disposed of in landfills.
Powdered coal has a larger surface area, allowing for more efficient combustion and energy production. It also burns more cleanly than lumps of coal, producing fewer emissions. Additionally, powdered coal is easier to transport and has better uniformity, leading to more consistent combustion.
Coal waste can persist in the environment for hundreds to thousands of years. The heavy metals and toxins in coal waste can leach into the surrounding soil and water, posing long-term environmental and health risks. Proper containment and treatment are essential to minimize the impact of coal waste on the environment.
The amount of waste generated from coal mining can vary depending on the extraction method and location. However, coal mining typically produces significant amounts of waste, including rock and soil (known as overburden) that is removed to access the coal seam, as well as waste rock and tailings generated during processing. This waste can have negative environmental impacts if not properly managed.
Burning oil produces fewer emissions and pollutants compared to coal, making it slightly better for the environment in terms of air quality. However, both oil and coal are fossil fuels that contribute to climate change, so transitioning to renewable energy sources is the most sustainable option.
Is cols better than cola? did you mean: coal?did you mean: coal?i wouldn't recomend eating coal on a diet. And coal is not better than coal. Sorry. Coca-Cola isn't as good as Dr.Pepper
Coal IS a fossil fuel
If this is a question of green energy, then yes, solar power is better than coal because it is a renewable source. Coal is a fossil fuel that is non-renewable.
Coal emits more carbon dioxide pollution than natural gas does.
because coal has more energy intake ?..,
Burning biomass is considered better than burning oil or coal because biomass is a renewable energy source that can be produced sustainably, whereas oil and coal are fossil fuels that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Additionally, burning biomass can help reduce waste by using organic materials that would otherwise be disposed of in landfills.
suck it
Powdered coal has a larger surface area, allowing for more efficient combustion and energy production. It also burns more cleanly than lumps of coal, producing fewer emissions. Additionally, powdered coal is easier to transport and has better uniformity, leading to more consistent combustion.
Solar power is more environment friendly than coal power. Solar power is, however, more expensive than coal power.
Coal waste can persist in the environment for hundreds to thousands of years. The heavy metals and toxins in coal waste can leach into the surrounding soil and water, posing long-term environmental and health risks. Proper containment and treatment are essential to minimize the impact of coal waste on the environment.
The waste by-product of burning coal and oxidized metal that have formed together. As said, it is a waste and end product of burning coal and heating iron.
Hydroelectricity emits far fewer pollutants (including carbon dioxide) than burning coal.