I honestly think is better working in a group because we can learn from them and they could learn from us like for example they might not now something and we may now that something that they don't know and if we don't now something they may no it and explanit it to us
social loafing
yes
"CDW-G is a company that provides computer products in bulk for certain groups at a cheaper price than buying the products individually. These groups include businesses, schools, and organizations."
The answer is definitely YES, depending at the variables you look at. Evidence indicates that smaller groups are faster at completing tasks than larger groups and that individuals perform better in smaller groups. However evidence has shown that larger groups are better in problem solving than smaller groups. Larger groups are known to be better at fact finding and smaller groups are better at taking action.
The children can build off each other, and can test their newfound ability in comparison with their peers.
The lesson of the Cocks and Hens story emphasizes the importance of unity and collaboration in facing challenges or threats. It highlights the idea that working together and supporting each other can lead to better outcomes than trying to deal with problems individually.
Working conditions today are better than they were duing the Industrial Revolution
working of grid station
Interest groups tend to be able to do more than political parties on specific issues. Political parties are more divisive than interest groups, and less likely to be listened to by members of the other parties.
Above all, people need education, so that they can understand that we are all members of the human race, and we will all be better off by working together to make a better world, rather than fighting with each other.
No
Yes as it conserves warmth and as a flock they have a better chance of protecting themselves from predators rather than individually.