Want this question answered?
historians
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
they have had that record in books and on papper
A civilization without any written language would be at a loss. Its ability to communicate and record anything would be greatly hindered.
Annal
Historians
A written record of Accounting information.
This is my answer to your question Historians find that archaeology provides both new information to complement the written record and important new questions about our past. Avocational archaeologists find the opportunity to make a direct contribution to research about the past. I hope this helpππβ
because beacuse
historians
Because nobody at the time thought it was important to record such information, and they didn't.
It is a valuable artifact because it was written as a historical record of the ancient Hebrews.
Written communication is important because it helps keep the message straightforward and thus avoid misunderstandings. It is also important for record keeping and future reference.
The ability to record events - written and not oral.
The subject of a red record can vary, but it is typically used to indicate important or sensitive information that requires attention, such as critical medical information or confidential data.
The noun "record" comes from the verb "to record", which came from the idea of memorizing information so that it would not be lost. Eventually it meant to write down information so that it would not be lost or forgotten, and the written form of this information was called a "record". A person who takes on the job of recording information and preserving it is a record keeper.
The difference between record keeping and information system is that traditional record keeping is a manual process of controlling and governing important records of a business. While an information system is the same procedure via computer system making the process easier.