answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why might a state argue that an unfunded mandate violate is rights?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if what?

A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if


John Locke did NOT argue that natural rights included the right to?

criminals do no not deserve to have rights


A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if?

Democrates


Why did antifederalists argue against ratification of the constitution?

it had no bill of rights


How can you argue against article one in the bill of rights?

Alaska is as big as my penis.


What did philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft argue for?

She fought for womens rights. Basically prostitution.


A proponent of states' rights would argue that?

the national government's powers should be interpreted narrowly.


Declaration of Independence could this document be used to argue for quitting?

The Declaration of Independence document can be used to argue for quitting. The Declaration of Independence document is used only for Theory and Natural rights.


What three natural rights did Locke argue that all people possess?

To be born free, equal and independent.


Why did settlers in California argue over water rights?

Settlers argued over water rights because they needed to be able to access water for farming, and other properties


Why did settlers in California argue over the water rights?

Settlers argued over water rights because they needed to be able to access water for farming, and other properties


What amendment restricts your personal rights?

As I see it, only two amendments restrict personal rights. The 18th prohibition of alcohol (which was repealed in the 21st amendment) and the 22nd restricting an individual to serving 2 terms (or up to 10 years) as president. You could argue the 26th limiting who can vote to those 18 and older as restricting rights too, but first you'd have to argue that minors are entitled to all the rights of adults.