0
Why might christians have been blamed by the roman authorities for the fire that destroyed rome?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThe Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why might Christians have been blamed by the Roman authorities for the fire that destroyed Rome in AD 64?
The Christian sect of Judaism at the time did not have synagogues or temples, but met in private houses. Romans readily accepted other religions, recognising that the gods were all the same, just with different names. However they could not comprehend why the Christians did not meet openly in temples. They were highly suspicious of 'secret' meetings, as this usually heralded political plots and revolutionary activity. So the private Christian meetings and the fires made a suspicious connection. All it would need would be for someone to denounce them and the Romans would react - as had happened with the second century BCE when a major cult was ruthlessly slaughtered.
What might of happened in kush and Egypt if kush had developed iron weapons?
Egypt would probably have been destroyed earlier.
The history of the Islam veil?
If you look in a picture of Mary with Jesus in some pictures, you see her wearing a veil. You might or might nit know this, but most christians are supposed to ear a veil in Christianity, so veils were even before Islam started, its just that christians nowadays aren't as good of believers as they were back then.
Did christian houses get searched during the holacost?
christians help people,so they might of hiding jews from the nazis Christian houses did get searched if someone had informed on the owners, that they might have been hiding Jews.
Why did Lord Baltimore want Maryland's act of toleration?
Fearing that Catholics might lose their rights, Lord Baltimore got the assembly to pass the Act of Toleration in 1649. It welcomed all Christians and gave adult male Christians the right to vote and hold office.
Why might Christian's have been blamed by roman authorities for the fire that destroyed Rome?
The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.The Christians could very easily be blamed for the fire that destroyed much of Rome during the reign of Nero. In the first place they were looked upon with suspicion because of their clannishness and secretive meetings. This conduct was contrary to the open Roman way of life. Much more damming evidence against them was that the firefighters were hindered by the Christians from doing their job and some were seen running through the city with torches. The ancient writers say that the Christians confessed. However, what they confessed to is not explained. The Christians could merely have been confessing to being Christian and not arsonists.
Why might Christians have been blamed by the Roman authorities for the fire that destroyed Rome in AD?
The Christian sect of Judaism at the time did not have synagogues or temples, but met in private houses. Romans readily accepted other religions, recognising that the gods were all the same, just with different names. However they could not comprehend why the Christians did not meet openly in temples. They were highly suspicious of 'secret' meetings, as this usually heralded political plots and revolutionary activity. So the private Christian meetings and the fires made a suspicious connection. All it would need would be for someone to denounce them and the Romans would react - as had happened with the second century BCE when a major cult was ruthlessly slaughtered.
Why might Christians have been blamed by the Roman authorities for the fire that destroyed Rome in AD 64?
The Christian sect of Judaism at the time did not have synagogues or temples, but met in private houses. Romans readily accepted other religions, recognising that the gods were all the same, just with different names. However they could not comprehend why the Christians did not meet openly in temples. They were highly suspicious of 'secret' meetings, as this usually heralded political plots and revolutionary activity. So the private Christian meetings and the fires made a suspicious connection. All it would need would be for someone to denounce them and the Romans would react - as had happened with the second century BCE when a major cult was ruthlessly slaughtered.
What is the difference between He was blamed for armed robbery and He was arrested for armed robbery?
if he was arrested then they know it was him but if he was blamed, then he might not have done it
How was Zeus destroyed?
he was never destroyed he is immortal and the most powerful god there might be myths about him being destroyed but that is fake his statue in Greece was destroyed though
Why might Christians have borrowed ways of worship form the Jewish religion?
The first Christians were Jewish.
Where is a good place Christians can mingle?
Christians can mingle by going to different churches to meet other Christians. Otherwise, there are Christian charities where one could volunteer and where one might meet other Christians.
What other authorities might the author have used to speak out against steroid use?
ewerew
Why some health authorities might be against it?
because sometimes they like all of the bacteria
What is ruined in slang?
You might say that something is "trashed" or that it's "destroyed."
What can happen to habitats when major earth events occur?
they might be destroyed
After a ghosts house is destroyed will it still haunt?
it might im not sure
