Shakespeare may have referred to Edward the Confessor's healing powers (as part of Act IV Scene 3 of Macbeth) for a number of reasons, all of which involve a comparison between Edward and Macbeth. Macbeth seeks help from witches and their familiar spirits who tell the future; Edward "solicits heaven" "with holy prayers" which give him "a heavenly gift of prophecy". Macbeth kills; Edward heals. Macbeth is Scottish (boo!) and Edward is English (yay!). Many scholars have noted that Malcolm's triumph at the end of the play is accomplished with the aid of Siward and his English troops, and almost his first act is to abolish the Scottish title "thane" and replace it with the English title "earl". The Anglicisation of Scotland is seen as a good thing from the point of view of the English nationalist Shakespeare, and the comparison of Macbeth and Edward forms a part of this.
Shakespeare may have focused on Edward as a healer to highlight his compassionate and caring nature, showcasing his ability to bring comfort and aid to others. By portraying Edward in this way, Shakespeare may have wanted to emphasize the importance of healing and the positive impact that a healer can have on society. Additionally, focusing on Edward as a healer could have added depth and complexity to his character, showcasing different facets of his personality beyond his royal status.
In Macbeth, Malcolm talks about Edward the Confessor's alleged ability to cure illness in Act IV Scene 3 in the middle of his conversation with Macduff. The purpose for injecting this observation a propos of nothing in the middle of the scene must be to contrast the Saintly Edward with Macbeth, and perhaps recall echoes of the Saintly Duncan. By contrast, Macbeth's faults are made to seem even more monstrous. And of course, this was all very politically correct at the time.
Dante might be considered second only to Shakespeare among renaissance poets. Moliere might be considered second only to Shakespeare among seventeenth-century playwrights. Marlowe might be considered second only to Shakespeare among English sixteenth century playwrights. Anne Hathaway might be considered second only to Shakespeare among people who lived in Stratford on Avon. George Bernard Shaw might be considered second only to Shakespeare among playwrights from Great Britain. Edward Bond might be considered second only to Shakespeare among playwrights who wrote a play about King Lear. I don't know who is second only to Shakespeare among people whose fathers made gloves.
It might be so Shakespeare was a play and peom writer so it might has well be
We have no idea what Shakespeare's thoughts as a child might have been.
If you buy the CD, you should be able to find the address of a web site on the CD and the lyrics might be there. Or you can just search the web. I know how you feel - the song is very powerful. YouTube has clips. You can listen and/or record or DL the song and the story. Got a link posted if you want it. The lyrics to the song itself are as follows: Jesus,Jesus,Jesus. Jesus,Jesus,Jesus. Jesus,Jesus,Jesus. Jesus,Jesus,Jesus. Savior, Savior, Savior. Savior, Savior, Savior. Savior, Savior, Savior. Jesus, Jesus, Jesus. Healer, Healer, Healer. Healer, Healer, Healer. Healer, Healer, Healer. Jesus, Jesus, Jesus. Thank you, Thank you, Thank you. Thank you, Thank you, Thank you. Thank you, Thank you, Thank you. Jesus, Jesus, Jesus.
Very few of Shakespeare's plays could be described as "generic", as he was always pushing boundaries and exploring new aspects of the form. Some of his early work might be considered to be generic, especially The Comedy of Errors, which is clearly in the style of (and based on a play by) Plautus. Titus Andronicus might be thought of as a generic revenge tragedy after the style of Kyd's Spanish Tragedy. If Shakespeare wrote Edward III, it is a fairly generic chronicle history play.
This is a harder question than you might think. Scholars agree that Shakespeare wrote in whole or in part the 37 plays in the Second Folio, and there is general agreement that he at least partly wrote The Two Noble Kinsmen. There is also evidence that he wrote other plays that have not come down to us, including Cardenio and Love's Labours Won. Finally there are plays which some people think might be by Shakespeare but others do not, like Edward III or The Second Maiden's Tale (which some scholars have suggested might really be Cardenio)
Probably William Shakespeare 1564-1616. But depending on the school, it might be anyone else called Shakespeare. It could be William Shakespeare Jr. ?-1950, the inventor of the even-winding fishing reel.
I personally believe that the best healer in the world is a man in Australia called Max Mancer. He has a website called "Light Axis Healing" that you can google and find. He really saved my life with his healings and I no longer have any pain or suffering in my life at all.
There is no evidence that William Shakespeare engaged in any sports. He might have done, but there is no reason to say so.
"Nay" means "no", not only in Shakespeare, but anywhere else you might happen to run across it.
Edward Cullen in the Twilight Series is not a dope, but in real life, as robertpattinson, he might be