Want this question answered?
It was the British Empire. It might not have lasted the longest but it was the most powerful and it's Navy owned the waters. The Empire owned 1/4 of the world. The closest in size was the mongol.
At the height of its power, the British Empire encompassed over 33 million km2 of land, the largest empire in history. The empire had territorial possessions in every continent, which led to the phrase "the sun never sets on the British Empire." By 1922 the British Empire held sway over about 458 million people, one-fifth of the world's population at the time.
people have different interpretations of primary sources
It will change history of the Mesopotamia by Sargon's creation of the empire .Without Sargon's creation the world might of been discovered in different ways.
As the British Empire grew, so did its strain on the economy of the home country. The cost of maintaining the empire escalated dramatically, forcing Parliament to pass laws to help alleviate the economic stress. One method in balancing their budget was to pass new taxes and laws onto its colonies. The colonies eventually grew restless at the influx of new tax payments, which caused tension between the colonists and their home country.
The combined might of the British Empire.
It was the British Empire. It might not have lasted the longest but it was the most powerful and it's Navy owned the waters. The Empire owned 1/4 of the world. The closest in size was the mongol.
At the height of its power, the British Empire encompassed over 33 million km2 of land, the largest empire in history. The empire had territorial possessions in every continent, which led to the phrase "the sun never sets on the British Empire." By 1922 the British Empire held sway over about 458 million people, one-fifth of the world's population at the time.
No. It might or might not be symptomatic of a decadent lifestyle, but the factors for the ending of a great Empire are far, far more complex. The British Empire, for example, has now, to all intents & purposes ceased to exist, but the factors which brought this to happen are very, very complex. I am sure this is not a single issue thing.....
It might have changed because the name changed
By definition, an "empire" is a state with many ethnic groups for its citizens, so Roman, Persian, Indian, Aztec, British, Chinese all qualify. The lone exception might be the Japanese "empire" which was racially all Japanese.
It might have changed because the name changed
The question might refer to Sigmund Freud's TheInterpretation of Dreams.
Both Mozambique and Rwanda are African Members of the Commonwealth of Nations who were never part of the British Empire. Cameroon might also be in that category, but a small part of Cameroon, called South Cameroon, was once a UN Trust territory administered by the UK.
Pax Roman us is Roman Peace (Peace though military strength) Pax Britannica would be the peace created by the military might of the British Empire.
It might have changed because the name changed
He called upon the various European States of his time, including: the Germanic States of the Holy Roman Empire, the Frankish Empire, the various Iberian Kingdoms like Castilla-Leon, Aragon, and Catalonia, the Hungarian Empire, and the British States.