0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What would a scientists do if similar investigations give different results?
they have to make sure that their answers from the similar investigation because it might be wrong
Why should scientists do repeated trials with every experiment?
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
Why are repeated trials important in scientific investigations and what should you do if repeated trials give very different results?
We know that many phenomena are quite variable. The weather is not the same every day. One person does not necessarily act the same way or have the same biological features as another person. Some individuals might be typical of their species, while others might be unusual in some way. So, if you are investigating some particular phenomenon, you want to make sure that the results that you got are normal or representative results, rather than anomalous results. Even aside from the variability of nature, there is also the factor of the imperfection of scientists. Scientists can also be sloppy, and can make mistakes. You might have used the wrong chemical, mislabeled something or misread a label, and so forth. We can never simply assume that any given experiment was done correctly. So, by doing something repeatedly, we can be more confident of the result. We confirm the result by getting it more than once. If, however, we do repeated trials and get different results, that is an interesting observation and it becomes necessary for us as scientists to find out the reason for these varying results. There is something we did not notice, something that is not the same, or something that is more unpredictable than we thought it was. Maybe we thought that all of our mice were the same, but it turns out that we are actually dealing with two different species of mice, and they have significantly different biological traits. Whatever the problem is, we have to track it down and identify it, otherwise we will never be able to understand the results of our experiment.
What does results will vary mean?
It means the results may vary depending on what people use in the test, or what the measure it at. Vary means 'might be different'.
In response to peer review a scientific journal might choose not to publish a paper submitted by a scientist. Which of the following is a reason why a paper might be rejected for publication?
Apex.The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.
What would a scientists do if similar investigations give different results?
they have to make sure that their answers from the similar investigation because it might be wrong
How might the results differ if a uva lamp were used?
wiki answers sux the big one.
Discuss what results you might obtain if you repeated this experiment using an endothermic organism?
the temperature of the endothermic organism would decrease and the cells in the organisms would explode because of the high water content in the cells.
Why should scientists do repeated trials with every experiment?
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
Why are repeated trials important in scientific investigations and what should you do if repeated trials give very different results?
We know that many phenomena are quite variable. The weather is not the same every day. One person does not necessarily act the same way or have the same biological features as another person. Some individuals might be typical of their species, while others might be unusual in some way. So, if you are investigating some particular phenomenon, you want to make sure that the results that you got are normal or representative results, rather than anomalous results. Even aside from the variability of nature, there is also the factor of the imperfection of scientists. Scientists can also be sloppy, and can make mistakes. You might have used the wrong chemical, mislabeled something or misread a label, and so forth. We can never simply assume that any given experiment was done correctly. So, by doing something repeatedly, we can be more confident of the result. We confirm the result by getting it more than once. If, however, we do repeated trials and get different results, that is an interesting observation and it becomes necessary for us as scientists to find out the reason for these varying results. There is something we did not notice, something that is not the same, or something that is more unpredictable than we thought it was. Maybe we thought that all of our mice were the same, but it turns out that we are actually dealing with two different species of mice, and they have significantly different biological traits. Whatever the problem is, we have to track it down and identify it, otherwise we will never be able to understand the results of our experiment.
What is Ad hoc internal investigations?
The phrase "ad hoc" means something formed for a specific purpose: an ad hoc committee, for example, is the opposite of a standing committee. Thus, ad hoc internal investigations would be specific investigations, rather than a periodic review. We might annually check who has keys to each room of the building, but if a set of keys goes missing, we might have ad hoc internal investigations to determine where they went.
How are areas within the same biome alike how might they differ?
they differ by the climate
How your own values in relation to hygiene might differ from those of individuals and how to deal with this?
how you own values in relation to hygiene might differ from those of individuals and how to deal with this
Why do you care about results?
because you might die.
Which Question might a writer ask when writing a synthesis pargraph?
When writing a synthesis paragraph, a writer might ask: What are the main points of the sources being synthesized? How can these sources be interconnected to support a unified thesis statement or argument? What additional research or analysis is needed to effectively merge the information from different sources into a coherent whole?
What might be two reasons why the data might not support the hypothesis?
Two reasons why data might not support a hypothesis are that the experiment had a flaw or was not repeated enough times. This happens a lot.
What scientists do that's is basis for their investigations?
investigation
