0
What would a scientists do if similar investigations give different results?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
they have to make sure that their answers from the similar investigation because it might be wrong
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Will similar investigations or expirements always have the same results?
no because they could do in different environment and could change.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Which statement best expresses a basic scientific assumption?
If a conclusion is valid, similar investigations by other scientists should result in the same conclusion.
How do scientists and historians differ in their work How are their jobs similar?
Scientists work on different stuff then historians do.
Will similar investigations or expirements always have the same results?
no because they could do in different environment and could change.
When scientists are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedure they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Which statement best expresses a basic scientific assumption?
If a conclusion is valid, similar investigations by other scientists should result in the same conclusion.
How do scientists and historians differ in their work How are their jobs similar?
Scientists work on different stuff then historians do.
How can unexpected results be as important as expected results in a science experiment?
So scientists can learn from their mistakes and they can look back on that information in a similar test.
How did alchemists similar to and different from modern scientists?
The alchemists were the first chemists. But in addition to mixing chemicals, they also believed that magic would help with their experiments and formulas. It didn't. But their experiments led to the development of the science of chemistry.
why might scientists conduct an experiment in a lab, and then repeat the experiment in the field?
To verify whether or not laboratory conditions are necessary to recreate the results. If the same experiment produces the same results in different environments, then the scientist knows that the results are sound. However, if the results are different in different places, then it may be an environmental factor of the laboratory that is affecting the outcome. Repeating the experiment in different environments allows scientists to either confirm or rule out this possibility.
What process assures that claims made by scientists are reliable?
Reproducibility is the major method for other scientists to confirm the work of one scientist. When one scientist does an experiment, s/he publishes the results so other scientist can read and verify the results. If similar results are obtained by verification, then the results are partially confirmed.
