Stop asking this kind of questions. Money is not noteworthy
Yes
because there more trees and when the water evaporates it goes to the clouds in north
the north indian rivers are perinnial as they are snow fed but the south indian rivers are seasonal as they are rain fed. Since they are rain fed there is no garranty of rain . So the south indian rivers are less suitable for irrigation than the rivers of north India.
no, there were more in the north than the south
The North was more industrialized while the South was agrarian.
The North had more capital than the South because of its dense population. Their industrialization was also much more developed than in the South.
Michigan. The most norther part of the Upper Peninsula is more north than South Dakota.
The North had less farm machinery than the South.
False; the North had far more soldiers than the South.
because the south was more agriculturally focused, where as the north was driven by manufacturing.
There was some slavery, for a time, in the North, but there were more crops in the South than in the North, e.g. less need in the north.
Slavery was more important to the South than it was to the North, because the South's economy relied on agriculture.