Want this question answered?
Not necessarily. It would depend on how much other evidence there is. By itself, DNA on a cigarette only proves that the suspect was physically present at the scene of the crime. It proves he was there at some unknown time, but it does not prove that he was there during the commission of the crime or that he committed the crime. It is a compelling piece of evidence, but it would need to be accompanied by other evidence, in order to ensure a conviction. For example, if eyewitnesses saw the suspect's car fleeing the scene, and if bullets matching those used in the crime were found at the suspect's home, THAT, combined with the DNA on the cigarette, would probably be enough to convict.
Blood evidence can help to identify the suspect who comitted the crime, (especially in regard to their unique DNA which is found in the blood).
"Probable Cause"
The perpetrator of a crime is the person who actually committed the crime. A suspect may or may not have committed the crime. A suspect has not been confirmed as being the perpetrator.
The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.
The word "convict" can function as both a noun and a verb. As a noun, it refers to a person found guilty of a crime. As a verb, it means to declare someone guilty of a crime.
Cause he did a crime
Forensic scientists look for blood at a crime scene because it can provide evidence of the identity of the individuals involved, the type of weapon used, the sequence of events, and the location of the incident. Blood spatter patterns can also help recreate the crime scene and establish what occurred during the crime.
Example- The suspect of the crime was the man in the black cloak. I.P- The investigators were suspect about the suspect they had chosen to have supposedly committed the crime.
The noun suspect is a person considered guilty of a crime, or a cause of other types of situations. Examples: The police have identified a suspect in the crime. A faulty joint is the main suspect for this leak.
a suspect in a crime is someone police think could have possibly have the motive and the opportunity to commit the crime, in other words a suspect is some who is believed to have committed the crime but there is no evidence suggesting it.
Treason is when someone gives comfort and aid to enemies of the United States or when they carry out war. The crime of treason cannot be held as corruption of blood.