0
The same reason every country should. They are unnecessary and pointless. Any use of them will result in catastrophe for everyone involved and won't solve anything at all. The exucse that "the US will fall behind and cease being a superpower, and would be at risk of attack" is a pure lie; the US spends more on the military than almost every other country put together.
With North Korea, Iran, and other countries like Russia, China, and India with Nukes, why should we get rid of ours?? Simple..We shouldn't..It is a cold hard fact that we live in a world where we are at risk from nuclear weapons..I wish they would all just go away..But stop blaming the Us..We do much more good than any country in the world, and we are always blamed as the bad guy..Usually by people that have no real clue as to what they are talking about, going only by what they read in the newspapers of countries jealous of American exceptionalism..
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How are nuclear weapons destroyed?
The only way that how are nuclear weapons are destroyed that these anti-nuclear working group stay together and work together to get these powerful nuclear weapons destroyed. It's possible to destroy nuclear weapons but it is a very hard and dangerous job. Want to know how nuclear weapons are destroyed? These people work as a team by staying together, they also disable nuclear missile launching systems to prevent the nuclear weapons from being launched. They work very carefully to make sure that the nuclear weapon cannot make wide explosions. They destroy the missile very carefully so that the missile cannot make very huge nuke explosion. They also stop nuclear bombs from being dropped by making sure that the bomb is destroyed but they have to place something to destroy the nuclear bomb and they must be very careful because nuclear missiles and nuclear bombs are very powerful. There should be a time bomb to destroy these weapons and don't let these weapons create big explosions. If there is then they place the time bomb on nuclear weapon, they also have to move very far away from the weapon to make sure that they are safe and can't get killed. To destroy nuclear weapons, these nukes have to be sent very far away from the city or from the town so people can't get killed by the nukes.
Should nuclear energy be banned?
Actually it is good and bad. Nuclear energy can save many people lives but in can be used as nuclear weapons which are super dangerous. resulting in explosions.
Why should there be no nuclear weapons?
U.S. President Ronald Reagan and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev came within a hair's breadth of agreeing to phase out their stockpiles of nuclear weapons. General Zhu Chenghu of China's National Defense University, made some remarks that stirred an unusual uproar in the West and in the United States in particular. According to reports in the Western media, Gen. Zhu, in responding to questions in a briefing session on China's foreign and security policy with a delegation of foreign journalists based in Hong Kong, seemed to indicate that in a possible military conflict with the United States over Taiwan, Beijing would be no match for the United States in terms of conventional capability. Zhu thus suggested that China should perhaps be the first to use nuclear weapons to deter a possible U.S. intervention. Today, the United States is the only nuclear power that continues to deploy nuclear weapons outside its own territory. The approximately 480 nuclear bombs in Europe are intended for use in accordance with NATO nuclear strike plans, the report asserts, against targets in Russia or countries in the Middle East such as Iran and Syria. Israel has not confirmed that it has nuclear weapons and officially maintains that it will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East. Yet the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons is a "public secret" by now due to the declassification of large numbers of formerly highly classified US government documents which show that the United States by 1975 was convinced that Israel had nuclear weapons But as the questions says, there should no be nuclear weapons.
Why should we stop nukes?
Your question makes the assumption that "nukes" should be stopped. Nuclear weapons were developed to provide overwhelming military force. The case can and has been made that nuclear weapons are a necessity in preventing the use of force by other nations. While this is not a popular view among many people, the argument can be made that it is a realistic viewpoint.
Do nuclear weapons effect Global Warming?
Probably not. If anything, nuclear explosions should have a cooling effect, because they send so much junk (soot, ash) into the atmosphere. It stays up there for a while, blocking light from the sun. This is the feared "nuclear winter" that would happen if a major nuclear exchange occurred. Volcanoes have a similar effect, but it takes quite a large eruption to have a noticeable effect.
Should you destroy all nuclear weapons?
nuclear weapons should not be destroyed they should be improved by my finding in 2023 there will be an alien attack on the united states of america, #getpussy
Should the south African government destroy all its nuclear weapons?
It has already been done. South Africa dismantled its 6 nuclear weapons in 1991.
What are the main points of Obama's political agenda?
Obama is trying to destroy America by bringing the power of America down to the power of other weaker countries. Also he believes that America should not have more Nuclear Weapons then other Countries so he gets rid of them.
How are nuclear weapons destroyed?
The only way that how are nuclear weapons are destroyed that these anti-nuclear working group stay together and work together to get these powerful nuclear weapons destroyed. It's possible to destroy nuclear weapons but it is a very hard and dangerous job. Want to know how nuclear weapons are destroyed? These people work as a team by staying together, they also disable nuclear missile launching systems to prevent the nuclear weapons from being launched. They work very carefully to make sure that the nuclear weapon cannot make wide explosions. They destroy the missile very carefully so that the missile cannot make very huge nuke explosion. They also stop nuclear bombs from being dropped by making sure that the bomb is destroyed but they have to place something to destroy the nuclear bomb and they must be very careful because nuclear missiles and nuclear bombs are very powerful. There should be a time bomb to destroy these weapons and don't let these weapons create big explosions. If there is then they place the time bomb on nuclear weapon, they also have to move very far away from the weapon to make sure that they are safe and can't get killed. To destroy nuclear weapons, these nukes have to be sent very far away from the city or from the town so people can't get killed by the nukes.
Why India should not go for nuclear weapons?
India already has nuclear weapons.
Should the UK have nuclear weapons?
No one should have nuclear weapons! I agree they cause nothing but problems. All they do is grant people power to kill and strike fear in the world. There is nothing good that can come from nuclear weapons.
Should other nations be concerned about India and Pakistan testing nuclear weapons?
Yes hence the word NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Should the Indian government encourage nuclear weapons for the security of the country?
India is already a nuclear power, and they have nuclear weapons on hand. They have already made the decision to "encourage" nuclear weapons, and presumably for increasing their own security.
Should you bomb Iraq with nuclear weapons?
I do not have the power to bomb anything or anyone. As for whether anyone should use nuclear weapons, I am fervently opposed to that idea.
Do you think That Muslims should use nuclear bombs?
I believe no one should use nuclear weapons.
What type of training school should one have to work with nuclear weapons?
The US military has Special Weapons Schools where you learn how to operate, maintain, etc. nuclear weapons.
What penalties if any do you believe countries should face of attack others using nuclear weapons?
Assuming not attacked first, reparations and UN should forcibly seize their armament and destroy ability to manufacture additional
