They should not be granted human rights, but the right to freedom from use/enslavement/exploitation should be granted. For example, the right to vote is a tad stupid for an animal.
Animals should not have Human Rights BEFORE or IF we ever invent a device that can help us communicate with them.
Yes i think that animals should have rights because we are just another species of animals.
No. Animals (at least the ones known so far) do not have the concept of human rights.
Of course they can't there not HUMAN. Animals have rights too you know.
no animals should not be ligalised because they should also have rights
They r talking away other ppl's human rights so why shud they deserve human rights? Y?
Ensuring equal rights for all individuals is a fundamental aspect of protecting human rights.
i think humans are superior then animals because if we didn't have animals to test on then we would have to test on our selves and more human would die from the chemical test and animals need humans to live so they can live.
because if there were no human rights many countries could suffer from the police and anyone can do anything to anyone and the higher rate of crime could increase more becausf the is no rights to protect anyone.
All human beings deserve the same rights.
It would depend on what you are comparing 'equal' to. Animals are just that. Animals. In the sense of they are not human and cannot be compared with humans. Certainly all animals are deserving of being treated with such compassion and as humanely as is befitting. Wanton cruelty towards them should be discouraged and legislated against.
This statement emphasizes the importance of upholding human rights through the legal system. It means that laws should be created and enforced to safeguard and promote the rights and dignity of all individuals, ensuring fairness, equality, and justice for everyone. The rule of law serves as a crucial framework for holding governments and individuals accountable for respecting and protecting human rights.