because they shouldnt
I would say as much as possible, because every little bit helps. Apart from that, it would depend on their socio-economic status and general surroundings as to what kind of science knowledge and how much they should know of it.
to know how much weight a person should weigh based on their height
You need to include the scientific method ( hypothesis, procedure, etc) you should have background information, graphs, have your observations and a model if possible. Understand what you are talking about. Hope this helps! =)
There is no reason that science should not be compulsory for school. If you are scientifically illiterate you are illiterate.
Journalists write on different topics. Science can take a part of many topics. Having an understanding of science will help a journalist understand the issues and hopefully explain them too. Often, I feel journalists should use science more. Whether it is finance, science, politics or sports, the more a journalist knows, the better their articles can become. Also the less likely they are to pass on ridiculous news that doesn't make scientific (logical) sense. A journalist can be tricked as easily as any other educated person. Good luck to us all. We are all affected by the "colour of the lenses" that journalists see through.
There should be no limit to methods of revolutionary status. This is how we progress in science and in technology.
he felt that science should be used as a way to understand the world
He felt that science should be used as a way to understand the world.
he felt that science should be used as a way to understand the world
As much as he/she is capable of understanding.
From a Christian perspective, the Bible tells WHAT God is and WHAT he does. Science describes HOW God does things.
So you can understand science. Almost every branch of science relies heavily on statistical analysis.
Science is interesting, therefore, if you learn about it, you should be interested by it. Only people who have failed to understand science, usually as a result of a haphazard approach that did not prepare them to understand material in a logical sequence, will then be uninterested in the subject.
Say, "I don't understand."
This should be based on interest, not gender. It all depends on if the person likes math/science or not.
trying to understand the emotions another person is feeling. offering advice on what should be done not telliong a disstressed person that you dont understand.
You should look for a reputable person with experience teaching. If a person can't prove they understand biology, don't hire them. If a person doesn't understand teaching or tutoring, you'll never get anywhere with them.