answersLogoWhite

0

Humans need more electricity, regardless of source. Hydroelectric and other renewable sources of energy are preferred to energy produced from the burning of fossil fuels.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is hydroelectric power more expensive than coal and oil?

no it is cheaper


South America produces more power using?

hydroelectric generation


Is hydroelectric energy more efficient than wind power?

Yes, but only because Hydroelectric generated electricity can be produced 24/7.


What two countries have more than half of their power from hydroelectric power?

Norway is one I guess Iceland is another.


What state produces the most hydroelectric power?

When the water is falling from height. The more the falling speed, the greater the energy.


What is nonrenewable energy resource?

Any source of energy that we cannot reproduce in a reasonable amount of time is considered nonrenewable. For instance, oil is considered to be nonrenewable because humans cannot make more of it. The opposite, renewable resources, are things like wind power, solar power, and hydroelectric power.


What produces more power in South America than any other continents?

hydroelectric generation


Is it a better option to produce electricity as compared to hydroelectric power stations?

Hydroelectric power stations certainly have their advantages and disadvantages, as do all forms of electrical generation. Probably the best solution is to use a combination of different means of producing electricity, with hydroelectric stations as part of the mix.


South America produces more power using than any other continent.?

hydroelectric generation


Why does New Zealand make more use of hydroelectric power than the UK?

It makes very good sense for New Zealand to make much more use of hydroelectric power than the UK because New Zealand has more lakes which are situated high above sea level than the UK.


Some argue that hydroelectric power should be used to generate more energy for the US Which argument could be used to dispute this idea?

apex!! It can only be used in areas with specific kinds of rivers:)


Some argue that hydroelectric power should be used to generate more energy for the Us what argument could be used to disputes this idea?

Critics of expanding hydroelectric power argue that it can lead to significant environmental impacts, such as habitat destruction and altered water quality, which can harm local ecosystems and biodiversity. Additionally, the construction of large dams can displace communities and disrupt traditional ways of life. Furthermore, hydroelectric power is subject to variability based on water availability, making it less reliable during droughts or changing climate conditions. These factors raise concerns about prioritizing hydroelectric energy over more sustainable and less intrusive renewable sources.