People should NOT based on whose genes are superior because there is no true objective process so everyone will think their own groups genes are superior. And since the human geneome is so similar from person to person, tryig to do so is inherently wasterful, unproductive and simply stupid.
Aside from being impossible because there is no way to objectively identify "superior" genes, attempting to separate people by their superior or inferior genes, is inherently unproductive and wasteful because so much of the human genome is the same from person to person.
is a respondeat superior
Segregation separated people based on the color of their skin.
Thomas Jefferson stated the government should be based on protecting the rights of people's freedom. The Declaration of Independence was based on the rights of people.
They are based on how society (i.e.: the community at-large) wishes them to act.
"Science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated." "The question of how the structure of the protein molecule is related to the function of the living cell is one of the great questions of biology." "Science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated." "Knowledge only progresses if it is based on evidence. We cannot progress by simply making a guess, and then defending our guess with emotional rhetoric."
Racism is the belief that one race is superior to others, leading to discrimination or prejudice against people of different races. Social Darwinism is the belief that certain groups of people are naturally superior to others based on evolutionary principles, often used to justify social inequality and discrimination.
Pareto superior is a state (based on the Pareto criteria) in which one parameter is improved without causing a negative effect on a different parameter.
Popularity is stupid. All I have to say. It's based on mean people who are rude and think they're superior to others. Please, do yourself a favor. And don't worry about it:) They "popular" people will be working for you someday ;)
In a democracy, yes.
It's not a grammar issues as much as a style/logic issue. I think technically you should probably write:the Germany-based company BMW(Note the use of the hyphen.) If you wrote "the German-based company BMW," people would understand it, but technically you'd be saying the company is based on the German language, not in Germany the country, so that would be less correct.However, it would be stylistically superior to write simply this:the German company BMWThis is very clear, and more succinct as well.
No, a news article should be based on facts. Facts can include the opinions of people interviewed for the article, but not the opinions of the reporter.