The theory of evolution states that all things originated from one common ancestor. The research should continue because it is just a theory, therefore not fact. So anyone can say "Oh that doesn't matter, it's just a theory". But for all we know it could be wrong...
Scientific evolution is the evolution of scientific methodology through time; from the first attempts to derive knowledge about the world through observation, to the first formal approaches to do so structurally, including experimentation, to the current system of research and publication, which includes a formal scientific ethos.
I'm not sure that there exists such a thing as "factors of macro-evolution". Macro-evolution is simply what happens when reproductively isolated populations continue to diverge as a result of micro-evolution. They drift apart genetically, behaviourally and morphologically, so that the differences between them become greater and greater. The mechanisms that cause this are reproductive variation and differential reproductive success, the principal mechanisms of evolution.
There is strong evolutionary evidence by people such as Darwin.There is evidence in our biological structures ie: bones and DNA in particular.Although evolution (the theory) is debated there is very strong evidence (look at Darwins books and research)
There's no such thing as an "evolution scientist". There is, however, such a thing as an evolutionary biologist. Evolutionary biology encompasses all research into the evolutionary processes that shape life. This includes an extremely wide variety of activities, which is difficult to summarize in a few words. Thy are sarchig for gold.
Robin Dunbar proposed, based on primate research, a relation between brain size and the number of social relationships an individual can maintain. Dunbar proposed, furthermore, that the evolution of language greatly reduced the mental effort required to maintain the same number of social relationships. How this all relates to the evolution of the brain is not immediately evident to me, although it undoubtedly does.
The theory of evolution states that all things originated from one common ancestor. The research should continue because it is just a theory, therefore not fact. So anyone can say "Oh that doesn't matter, it's just a theory". But for all we know it could be wrong...
why not
yep
yes
Research on evolution is no more limited than any other scientific research. In fact, hundreds of research papers related to evolution are published every year.
evolution of retail in india
Absolutely. Evolution isn't an historical process; it is on-going as long as there is life.
evolution
Marketing Evolution is a market research firm which provides ROI solutions for marketers through survey research and analytic methods. It is so called because it's emphasis on research and statistics are a departure from the norm of other market research firms.
He incorporated the Acquired Traits theory into evolution, which Darwin's research proved as BS.
bcoz of his research
No. This is a creationist canard.