You're asking for a matter of opinion, and mine generally disagrees with your notion, namely with most of these "control" measures being pushed for a political agenda, in spite of the lack of effectiveness in impacting crime.
barak obama is pushing for more vigurous gun control laws and background checks
They have gun laws. Whether they actually have the words "gun control" within any of their firearms legislature, I don't know, but they do have gun control.
NRA members vote against gun control laws.
It's arguable that the current gun control laws in the US are stretching the constitution to the breaking point. Anything much stricter and it would be impossible to maintain the fiction that they're compatible with the 2nd amendment.
There are thousands of laws that relate to gun control, and cover every state. Those laws have been there for years.
Mexico.
The B.A.T.F.E enforce gun control laws.
Your question is asking for an opinion. My opinion: There are more than 20,000 gun laws already on the books- and they do not work. They do not work because people that commit crimes do not obey laws.
Your question asks for an opinion. My opinion is that gun control laws are based on a flawed belief that a person who will break laws regarding murder, robbery and rape will obey another law that says they may not have a gun. There are already about 20,000 Federal, State, and local gun laws on the books in the US. Gun control laws frequently do little except keep law abiding people from being able to defend themselves.
You will have to define the term "Gun Control". In the United States, there are already about 20,000 laws on the books (yes, that was twenty thousand) that deal with making, importing, selling, owning, carying, and using guns.
Gun laws.
They should not be.