Because mane
There were northern states which were slave states prior to the war. To say either was "anti-slavery" kinda dumbs down the issue.
he fled to the north so he could be free and lead an anti-slavery boycot
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a compromise between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in Congress agreeing to prohibit slavery in states north of the parallel 36°30' north except in the state of Missouri. Additionally, the state of Maine was allowed to join the Union as a free state. This compromise was passed due to concerns of the creation of the state of Missouri destroying the delicate balance between slave states and free states in Congress.
One of the obvious differences between the North and the South during the U.S. Civil War was that the North was anti-slavery and the South was pro-slavery.
As you know, the opinion of pro-slavery in the south, and anti-slavery in the north, but i hear there are more reasons.
Union state in the civil war with is North and was anti slavery
The North and the West for the most part were anti-slavery.
Yes. The South was pro-slavery, while the North was anti-slavery. Hope this helps!
No they thought slavery was bad that's how the civil war started but in the 1800s there was slavery in the north and south. The Union was anti-slavery.
There were northern states which were slave states prior to the war. To say either was "anti-slavery" kinda dumbs down the issue.
he fled to the north so he could be free and lead an anti-slavery boycot
The issue that the North and South fought over was called the Wilmot Proviso. It was basically a law of slavery: the North and South were fighting over slavery. The North were anti-slavery and the South were pro-slavery
The Republican Party was and still is anti slavery. Abraham Lincoln, the president that ended slavery, was a Republican. The Democrat Party supported slavery. Many that fought, fought to defend their state regardless of their views on slavery.
I want to say the big question was whether or not the state was anti-slavery or not. It was always about maintaining the balance. For every anti-slavery state there would have to be an arrangement to have a pro-slavery state.
The Union (North) (Anti-Slavery) and the Confederates (South)(Pro-Slavery).
No- not all Southerners were pro-slavery, just like not all Northerners were anti-slavery.
there are tons of other websites that will give you that answer but the main reason was because of slavery issues between the north and the south. the north was anti slavery and the south was pro slavery.