No, viruses are approximately 100-1000 times smaller than a mitrochondrion (which is roughly the size of a bacterium). Viruses are dependent upon the host cell for any necessary energy requirements.
No viruses don't have mitochondria
Mitochondria are double membrane bounded structure found only in eukaryotes.
As viruses are acellular (those substances whose bodies are not made up of cells) mitochondria are not present in them.
No. Virus is not alive, so it does not need to make ATP in order to move around. The only way they move is by going with the flow (i.e. blood vessels, lymph vessels, air current).
Also, the virus is way too small to even contain a mitochondria. Mitochondria is about as big as some bacteria, while a virus is hundreds of times smaller than a bacteria.
From a biological standpoint, viruses are not considered living organisms. This is because they are obligate parasites. They depend completely on the host in order to survive and replicate. This is the reason why they do not need an energy generating organelle like the mitochondria. Viruses work by hijacking the protein machinery of the host cell. They derive their energy from the host.
Virus do not have cells.They have no organells.
Virus do not have mitochondria.They do not have any organell.
No- viruses are acellular, which means that they are not made up of groups of cells, and thus do not have mitochondria present in them.
Bacteria are not classified by the number of chromosomes, or the type of mitochondria.
All living organisms except procayotes require mitochondria to survive. Viruses are not living and they do not have any organelles.
There is no yes or no answer to this question, it is the same with the question on whether or not viruses are alive. It is worth mentioning though, that mitochondria are able to respire unlike viruses. They share a few characteristics with living organisms. Mitochondria poses their own DNA, they reproduce and respire. Mitochondria are similar to bacteria in many ways. A good theory on the origin of mitochondria is that a bacteria survived after being engulfed by a larger cell, and formed a mutual symbiosis. If it helps, my personal opinion is that mitochondria are alive, but heavily dependent on a mutual symbiosis of a host cell.
no i dont think so seeings viruses dont even have cells and good luck
Ribosomes are the smallest between mitochondria, viruses, bacterium, and protein. Ribosomes are the building blocks of mitochondria, viruses, bacterium, and proteins.
No- viruses are acellular, which means that they are not made up of groups of cells, and thus do not have mitochondria present in them.
Bacteria are not classified by the number of chromosomes, or the type of mitochondria.
There is no yes or no answer to this question, it is the same with the question on whether or not viruses are alive. It is worth mentioning though, that mitochondria are able to respire unlike viruses. They share a few characteristics with living organisms. Mitochondria poses their own DNA, they reproduce and respire. Mitochondria are similar to bacteria in many ways. A good theory on the origin of mitochondria is that a bacteria survived after being engulfed by a larger cell, and formed a mutual symbiosis. If it helps, my personal opinion is that mitochondria are alive, but heavily dependent on a mutual symbiosis of a host cell.
All living organisms except procayotes require mitochondria to survive. Viruses are not living and they do not have any organelles.
macs dont get viruses macs dont get viruses
no i dont think so seeings viruses dont even have cells and good luck
Viruses, bacteria, and organelles that a cell ingests are broken down in the mitochondria.
Viruses dont have a cell membrane. Instead, they have a protein sheath.
viruses dont have cells
no it is i dont know consult biology.com
I dont know you find it