0
Some could say that since he conquered most of his surrounding lands and he was a brave warrior before he died on his way torwards his home land
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoHe was the first and the greatest ruler of Imperial Rome, to which he brought a lasting peace after decades of civil war.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was the first emperor evil?
If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.
Who was the best emperor of rome?
The best emperor of Rome would probably be Augustus. He was the one who smoothly established a new form of government and in addition, reformed the army and rebuilt the city.
Who is Gaius Maecenas?
Gaius Maecenas (70BC-8BC) was a rich and powerful Roman and close colleague of Octavian, who became Emperor Augustus. His is best remembered for sponsoring the arts and was patron (financial supporter) of many of the "Augustan" poets.
Why was Emperor Constantine important?
He made it the state religion and when he captured people in one of his wars they had a choice to convert or die.
What is Constantine about?
Constantine was an Emperor of Rome who stopped the persecution of Christians and in 324 made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire. Then in 330 he moved his capital from Rome to Byzantium and renamed it Constantinople.
Was Augustus the third Roman Emperor?
No he was not the third emperor. He was the first roman emperor.
Was the first emperor evil?
If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.If you are referring to the first Roman emperor, no, he was not evil. On his way up he had to do some nasty things, but once he gained supreme power he showered benefits on the empire and the city and was the best loved emperor in Roman history.
What does the roman emperor eat?
A Roman emperor could eat whatever he wanted. They were individuals and had individual tastes. For example, Augustus had very simple tastes while Nero liked to try the best of everything.
What is diocletion?
Diocletian was a Roman emperor, best known for his dividing the empire, thinking it would be easier to rule. He is the only Roman emperor to retire and live out his life away from politics, they say growing cabbages.
When did the roman empire reach its peak?
By 117 AD, the Roman Empire has reached its peak. That is true, the roman empire peaked at that time. But later, the eastern roman empire, or byzantine empire, controlled most of the old roman empire plus some territory to the east, but I think that the best response to that question is 117 AD
Who was the first emperor of the roman empire and some of his accomplishments?
The first Roman emperor was Augustus. One of his achievements was to create the absolute rule by emperors which followed the fall of the Roman Republic. He attained political stability after a period of civil wars by assuming a tight control over the state and instituting a strong central government. He expanded the Roman empire to improve the security of its frontier areas. He was a patron of the arts and of poetry and presided over the best period of Latin literature. He promoted the development of thriving trading networks around the empire and the building of road networks. He sponsored many public works, especially in the city of Rome. On his deathbed he said "I found Rome a city of bricks and I have left it a city of marble.
Who was the first emperor of the Roman Empire and what were his accomplishments?
The first Roman emperor was Augustus. One of his achievements was to create the absolute rule by emperors which followed the fall of the Roman Republic. He attained political stability after a period of civil wars by assuming a tight control over the state and instituting a strong central government. He expanded the Roman empire to improve the security of its frontier areas. He was a patron of the arts and of poetry and presided over the best period of Latin literature. He promoted the development of thriving trading networks around the empire and the building of road networks. He sponsored many public works, especially in the city of Rome. On his deathbed he said "I found Rome a city of bricks and I have left it a city of marble.
Who was the best emperor of rome?
The best emperor of Rome would probably be Augustus. He was the one who smoothly established a new form of government and in addition, reformed the army and rebuilt the city.
Who is Gaius Maecenas?
Gaius Maecenas (70BC-8BC) was a rich and powerful Roman and close colleague of Octavian, who became Emperor Augustus. His is best remembered for sponsoring the arts and was patron (financial supporter) of many of the "Augustan" poets.
When Rome declined did Constantinople become the center of roman power?
Yes. By the time the Western Roman Empire ended its territory was no more than at best a third of the eastern Roman Empire and the last Emperor Romulus Augustulus ruled over little more than today's Italy. After his deposition, his successor the 'barbarian' general Odoacer presented himself as no more than a vassal king of the Eastern Roman Emperor. The Roman Senate asked the Emperor in Constantinople 'to reunite the two parts under his rule'. Which after some time Byzantium did, (re-)conquering - at least for a time - great parts of the former Western Empire, including most of Italy itself.
Why was Emperor Constantine important?
He made it the state religion and when he captured people in one of his wars they had a choice to convert or die.
What best summarizes the pax romana?
Augustus Caesar used his broad powers as emperor to usher in a time of peace. Roman culture flourished, and ambitious public works projects improved the lives of Rome's subjects everywhere.(APEX)
