0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did Austria not like the french revolution?
a) it was opposed to the absolute power of monarchs, and the Emperor of Austria was an absolute monarch. b) The Emperor of Austria was Marie-Antoinette's brother
Why was Oliver Cromwell rule like that of an absolute monarch?
Cromwell's rule was increasingly authoritarian and he became extremely unpopular. Most of the English were not unhappy at his death in 1658. Attempts to have Cromwell's son take his place failed and the monarchy was restored in England.
Oliver cromwell considered England under Charles I as full of what traits.?
Oliver Cromwell considered England under Charles I as autocratic, corrupt, and oppressive. He believed that Charles I ruled with absolute power, disregarding the rights and liberties of the people. Cromwell saw the government as highly corrupt, favoring the wealthy and aristocrats, and oppressing the commoners.
What were Oliver Cromwells ideas?
he believed in kissing babys and having baths. his famous quote's were "go have a bath..." and "i like big liver's and i cannot lie" LOL I DIDNT WRITE THIS BUT ITS FUNNY
What is the definition of Monarch?
It can be a butterfly or a ruler like the pharoes of Egypt.Prince of a sovereign state
Why was oliver cromwells rule like of an absolute monarch?
The generals of his own army ruled the twelve districts of England. He tore up constitutionalist documents. He closed down pubs, brothels, theaters, art houses, and more. He held absolute power and did not use Parliament. someone answered this on Yahoo answers
How did absolute monarch change life in Europe?
what was life like fo the common european when absolute monarchs ruled
Why Oliver Cromwell's rule like that of an absolute monarch?
Cromwell's rule was increasingly authoritarian and he became extremely unpopular. Most of the English were not unhappy at his death in 1658. Attempts to have Cromwell's son take his place failed and the monarchy was restored in England.
How does the power of a pharaoh differ from that of a constitutional monarch like Queen Elizabeth?
Just go to this question in answer.com "The pharaoh of ancient Egypt was an absolute monarch how does the power of such a ruler differ from that of a constitutional monarch like Queen Elizabeth of great Britain? "
Why did Austria not like the french revolution?
a) it was opposed to the absolute power of monarchs, and the Emperor of Austria was an absolute monarch. b) The Emperor of Austria was Marie-Antoinette's brother
What is the difference between constitutional monarchy and an absolute monarchy?
In a constitutional monarchy, like in England, the monarch does not have much power at all, because there is a constitution. In an absolute monarchy, they have absolute power. In a constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch is limited by some set of rules or document (e.g. a constitution), which sets out the powers given to the monarch. Other powers are given to other groups, commonly judges and a legislature. How much power is given to each group and the monarch varies widely, and is entirely up to the constitution of the country in question. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is presumed to be God-(or other deity)-ordained, and rules with no limits on their power.
Compare and contrast absolute and constitutional monarchy?
In a constitutional monarchy, like in England, the monarch does not have much power at all, because there is a constitution. In an absolute monarchy, they have absolute power. In a constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch is limited by some set of rules or document (e.g. a constitution), which sets out the powers given to the monarch. Other powers are given to other groups, commonly judges and a legislature. How much power is given to each group and the monarch varies widely, and is entirely up to the constitution of the country in question. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is presumed to be God-(or other deity)-ordained, and rules with no limits on their power.
What type of rights do kings have as leaders of a monarchy?
In an absolute monarchy, the king has complete power over society. In a constitutional monarchy, the king only has as much power as the constitution grants him. In some places, like Morocco, the constitutional monarch is very powerful, but not quite absolute. In some places like Britain, the constitutional monarch is so weak that it is practically an irrelevancy.
What is a realm?
like a monarch like a monarch
How does the power of an absolute ruler like the Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt differ from that of a constitutional monarch like Queen Elizabeth of Great Brittan?
An absolute ruler has the ability to create, sign off on, and enforce any rule, law, edict, or judgment that he desires. He is not required to listen to anyone's opinion, though he may solicit it and he is not required to follow any laws himself. A constitutional monarch is bound by a constitution, restricting his power as concerns his abilities to create, sign off on, and enforce rules, laws, edicts, and judgments. In the case of Queen Elizabeth I, she had no power to create laws and rules and could only issue edicts or sign off on laws or rules given to her by the legislature. Additionally, because the judiciary was a separate branch she had no direct authority over judgments. The most important difference between a constitutional monarch and an absolute monarch is that the constitutional monarch is bound by the law and can be held accountable for his actions; the absolute monarch is above the law.
What is the difference of an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy like Queen Elizabeth?
In an absolute monarchy, there is no limit on the power of the ruler. A constitutional monarchy imposes certain limits on the ruler's power. In the UK, the monarch's role is largely ceremonial.
What is the economy like in an absolute monarchy?
it is like a capitalist economy An absolute monarchy is a form of government (i.e. political system), and NOT an economic system. Absolute monarchies can employ a variety of economic models - it depends entire on the choice of the monarch. Your question is unanswerable, since the form of government and form of economics used by a country are orthogonal (i.e. independent of each other).
