because
as he was creative in the way he decided his choosings and thought of new ideas when first ones failed.
he was not a good king
William was a good king because he was well prepared and was a good leader.
William of Normandy was king Edwards cousin
no the zulu king killed him
William of Normandy shouldn't be king as he came from france not england
he is a good leader because he is dum thats why
King Harold Godwinson also known as Harold II was the king before William of Normandy.
i do not know isnt that fantactic
cus he was a good king and he was very religious
William of Normandy thought he had to be king of England because he won the battle of Hasting
There were two Dukes of Normandy named William: William I Longsword was the 2nd Duke of Normandy. William II the Conqueror was the 7th Duke of Normandy (also known as King William I).
King William "the conquerer" of Normandy took the throne of England from King Harold of the Saxons he was a good king
William Duke of Normandy became King William I of England after his victory at the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
William duke of Normandy
William II ( Rufus)
William duke of Normandy came from France which was called Normandy in that era
King canute
1066-1087
William was crowned king of England. He couldn't be king of Normandy because it was, and still is, part of France; and the king of France would not have allowed that.
because he wants to be king of normandy
His second son, William Rufus. (His eldest son was Robert of Normandy.)
The Duke of Normandy became William 1 (William the Conqueror) in 1066
William of Normandy became king on the 25th of December 1066 after defeating the Saxons in the Battle of hastings on the 14th of October 1066.
He was crownd king in 1083
William the Duke of Normandy