Want this question answered?
Cartier took furs, fish, and other resources from the natives, which led to conflicts and strained relationships between the French explorers and the indigenous peoples.
Sexual (;
No. The French were christian and Natives were not
Beaver, otter, and other furs and skins.
The French Crescent was the expansion of French military forts on key rivers, expanding out from Quebec. The fur trade linked the natives to the Europeans. Beavers were soon depleted, and hunting them meant expanding to new territory. The military forts built on the rivers made up the French Crescent.
The French got along with many different kinds of natives. The French usually got along with natives that did what they wanted them to.
They didn't want beavers, they wanted their hides. They were used in the making of hats.
The natives found them very tasty.
fur from the beavers
The french Jesuists were mainly focused on converting the natives, but failed to do so due to the strong belief the natives had in their own god and because of the language barrier between the two races.
It was not a war between the French and Indians, it was a war between the British and French, with the Native Americans as allies on both sides. It is called the French and Indian War because if you're American/British, you were fighting the French and most of the Natives, hence French and Indian war.
The main difference between France and Spain and their colonization of the Americas was how they treated the natives. Initially, Spain's reason for settling in the Americas was to acquire the gold, silver and precious gems that could be mined on these continents. The natives were initially treated as slaves, and this harsh treatment, coupled with the passing of European diseases to the natives, who had no immunity, decimated the population. The French treated the Native Americans very admirably. They entered business partnerships with them, treated them as equals, and had no qualms about intermarrying with the natives.