It was extremely important that the Roman army build a camp properly because of security and also a proper camp was an efficient camp. A camp was only used on the march and most times the Roman army was marching into enemy territory. A proper camp with its ditch and stockade afforded protection against surprise night attacks. Also, every man knew where he was supposed to be in a camp that followed regulations. He knew where his tent was and the army slave knew where to unload the contubernium mule who carried the tent and food. Set up and take down ran efficiently and smoothly in a properly built marching camp.
The Latins (the Romans were Latins) and all the Italic peoples adopted and adapted the western Greek alphabet to develop their written languages when Greeks migrated to southern Italy and established settlements from the 8th to the 6th century BC. The Romans worked out how to build paved roads by themselves. It was a Roman innovation.
The Roman army was in all parts of the empire. It was due in large part to the army that Rome established the greatest western empire of its time. To Rome, all parts of the empire were important.
Hadrian's Wall was built by the Roman Emperor Hadrian to protect his Roman Army from the original inhabitants of Scotland, the Picts.
No, not quite. A Roman legion is a part of a Roman army. However at certain times and under certain conditions a "legion" could be considered the actual army. For example, if there was a need for a river crossing, a legion would be sent in to build a bridge and it would be said that the "army" built the bridge. It's all a matter of words. Generally, though, an army consisted of several legions under one commander.
The consuls were the heads of the republic and the army.
The Latins (the Romans were Latins) and all the Italic peoples adopted and adapted the western Greek alphabet to develop their written languages when Greeks migrated to southern Italy and established settlements from the 8th to the 6th century BC. The Romans worked out how to build paved roads by themselves. It was a Roman innovation.
If you mean the Roman empire, the Roman army built the roads, as they did almost all other major constructions.
The aqueducts were built by the army. Although they may have he names of either their builders or the ruler who was in authority when they were constructed, it was the army who did the actual building.
The Roman army was in all parts of the empire. It was due in large part to the army that Rome established the greatest western empire of its time. To Rome, all parts of the empire were important.
very
The Roman roads were constructed by the army. They were elevated slightly in the center for drainage purposes.
they were governed properly had the best weapons and turned prisoners into well trained warriors
*The Roman Army was important to the Roman Empire because they conquered many lands for the Roman Empire. *They also built many buildings, roads, bridges, etc for their people to use. *Without the Roman Army, the Roman Empire could have been destroyed many centuries earlier. *Their fighting tactics were much better than the other tribes which made them the best army in that time. Hope that this is a great resource, please enjoy. >:-) PS. This research was for my history class.
Pachacuti built the Inca Empire with a large, powerful army.
Hadrian's Wall was built by the Roman Emperor Hadrian to protect his Roman Army from the original inhabitants of Scotland, the Picts.
The Standard bearer was very important in the roman army because the soldiers were very trust worthy and very experienced as they had their own emblem.
No, not quite. A Roman legion is a part of a Roman army. However at certain times and under certain conditions a "legion" could be considered the actual army. For example, if there was a need for a river crossing, a legion would be sent in to build a bridge and it would be said that the "army" built the bridge. It's all a matter of words. Generally, though, an army consisted of several legions under one commander.