During the Civil War generals were still using the Napoleon style of combat which consisted of lining up soldiers in rows. The opposing sides were marched within fairly close range before they began firing. When this style of combat was first developed the close range was necessary due to the poor range of guns. By the time of the American civil war the range and accuracy of guns had vastly improved making the tradition of lining solders at close range to fire at one another an incredibly deadly practice.
The new repeating rifle killed too many soldiers too quickly.
I think you would find that a battle is deadly even you fought it in a very untraditional "dove of peace" formation...
No, there were many, more deadly battles. The German troops were unprepared and many of their large guns ran out of ammunition part way through the day.
I think so
Idgaf I needed to know this answer for social studies homework
France
Yes, only to protect though. Unlike Area 51, military bases are only untitled to use deadly force if absolutely necessary
mabye green berets i don't know it's a guess
Because HIV is contagious and deadly and affect the persons health and fitness.
American troops were forced to withdraw following deadly bombings.
World war 1
Depends on what it is armed with, if it is an f15, it would most definitely be a real threat to an enemy aircraft, but if it was a nuclear armed b52, it would be deadly to whole nations. Probably the most deadly would be the navy's nuclear armed submarines