he imprisoned peasants ,lost land in France argued with the pope ,charging extra taxes for the peasants he claimed crops of the peasants without paying them but the good thing about him was he did not sign the magna carta
He was a bad king because he didn't care about the 'magna carta' and he ruled the country in a bad way.
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
People in the Victorian times disliked King John and saw him as a failure and a villain. They thought he created his own problems and was cruel and a wicked king; the Devil in disguise.
Well he stopped Catholics going to there holy church so Guy Folks tried to bomb the houses of Parliament when King John was inside!
In which country?Bad king John of England was held captive in England of course. John the Good was probably held captive in England or France.
he was a bad soldier because he was a bad leader and showed the path of the other people the wrong side .
King John was considered a bad king . Very greedy selfish this was mainly for being a bad king and raising taxes!
Half.
i have no idea!! i think he was a bad leader coz all he cared about was the money he had got from royalty
King George Was A Bad Leader Because He Dident Let Any Slaves Celabrate Any Holidays.BAD RIGHT?
you
He was a bad king because he didn't care about the 'magna carta' and he ruled the country in a bad way.
In many books in recent years, the info and discussions show that king john was a good leader in war, good at improvisation, good at thinking and good strategic. The monkish chronicles in 1206 state that he was a very bad but this information was biased as the monks didn't like him as he was mean to the pope and increased taxes. The portrayal of king John in robin hood shows his bad side which may or may not be true.
king john married a 12 year old girl and he replaced hes brother because hes brother was supposed to be king not king john
Character of King John: Unscrupulous, cruel, disloyal. A notorious womaniserhttp://www.middle-ages.org.uk/king-john.htm
baron thought he was such a bad king that he had to sign the magna carta
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.