becauses hes a good guy
They weren't better off. This is a fallacy and false. Slaves are people owned by other people no matter where. The white supremacist tries to show that slavery is beneficial to the slave, but this is not true.
White schools were better than black. they had better teachers, and work areas. better supplies.
Nebraska had less problems than Kansas so Nebraska is a better state
We are built differently........its all in the thighs.
History portrays Joe Kennedy as a less than honest man, who lacked character. He is said to have made most of his money during prohibition performing illegal activities of the time. It is reported that he had ties to the mafia as well. Some of these rumors have haunted the family throughout time
becauses hes a good guy
John D. Rockefeller is often regarded as a more effective leader than other robber barons due to his innovative business practices and philanthropic efforts. He founded Standard Oil, which revolutionized the oil industry through efficient production and distribution methods, leading to lower prices for consumers. Additionally, Rockefeller's commitment to philanthropy, particularly in education and public health, set him apart, as he donated a significant portion of his wealth to charitable causes. This combination of business acumen and social responsibility contributed to his more favorable legacy compared to his contemporaries.
Actually the Mafia, other than their use of violence and murder, is no different from many other corporations in America. The leaders of the Mafia, were also much like the early founders of the United States. The robber barons of the late 1800's were worse than the mafia chieftains.
Levi Strauss is not typically considered a robber baron. He was a Jewish immigrant who founded Levi Strauss & Co., introducing durable jeans that became popular among miners and workers during the Gold Rush. Unlike robber barons, who often exploited labor and engaged in unethical practices for personal gain, Strauss is known for his philanthropy and fair treatment of workers. His legacy is more aligned with innovative entrepreneurship than with the exploitative tactics associated with robber barons.
Reguardless of what they actually did, Industrial Leaders were both Robber Barons and Captains of Industry, but just the presentation of their lifestyle could be biased to illustrate them as just one or just the other. Usually, conservative viewpoints show them as Robber Barons and Libral viewpoints show them as Captains of Industry.
Robber barons, such as John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, played a significant role in America's industrialization and economic growth, creating jobs and expanding industries. However, their practices often involved exploitative labor conditions, monopolistic tactics, and significant wealth inequality, which contributed to social unrest and economic disparities. While they helped build the infrastructure of modern America, many argue that their negative impacts on workers and fair competition outweighed their contributions. Ultimately, the legacy of robber barons is complex, reflecting both innovation and exploitation in the pursuit of profit.
They usually gained their trust by giving them land and money or maybe listened to them rather than other barons
Samuel Gompers is not considered a robber baron; rather, he was a prominent labor leader and the founder of the American Federation of Labor (AFL). Unlike robber barons, who were known for exploiting workers and consolidating wealth through unscrupulous practices, Gompers advocated for workers' rights, better wages, and improved working conditions. His efforts were focused on empowering labor and promoting social justice, making him a key figure in the labor movement rather than a symbol of industrial greed.
Marshall Field is often considered more of a Captain of Industry than a Robber Baron. He revolutionized retail with his innovative business practices, including the introduction of the department store concept and customer service policies that prioritized consumer satisfaction. While he amassed significant wealth, his contributions to the economy and the retail sector are viewed as positive, distinguishing him from the more exploitative practices typically associated with Robber Barons.
Frank Woolworth is often considered a captain of industry rather than a robber baron. He revolutionized retail with his concept of the five-and-dime store, making affordable goods accessible to the masses and significantly impacting the retail landscape. While he amassed considerable wealth, his business practices were generally seen as innovative and customer-oriented, reflecting a commitment to providing value rather than exploiting workers or engaging in monopolistic tactics typical of robber barons.
Rockefeller and Carnegie were known as robber barons because they amassed immense wealth and power through aggressive and often unethical business practices during the Gilded Age. They engaged in monopolistic tactics, such as price-fixing and undercutting competitors, to dominate their respective industries—oil for Rockefeller and steel for Carnegie. Their practices often exploited workers and stifled competition, leading to widespread criticism and the perception that they prioritized profit over social responsibility. This term reflects the public's view of their wealth acquisition as exploitative rather than entrepreneurial.
yes some resources are better than other.