ya, the Qin wanted to abolish it. in Han there were contracts that said what the slaves could and could not do. the slaves were'nt a big part of han society either.
First of all, Spartacus' rebellion gave the slaves of Rome another point of view on slavery. Being true that slaves were aware of freedom, they did not dare to defy Roman law. Even those who were enslaved in captivity during war, who most craved freedom did not find it possible to escape into freedom. Spartacus broke the paradigma many slaves were chained to, and proved that being free of roman law was possible. Spartacus´rebellion also decrease the ammount of slaves Rome had to about 100,000 less. This weakend Rome´s economy, and forced the Empire to take more precautions with the slaves. This made slavery much more expensive and selective, which gradually made the slave system inefficient and undesirable.
nOW THE ROMAN HAS LESS SENATORS? AND DIFFERENT BELIEFS.
some are more important because they have more meaning to life and they were created and first discovered before any of the other less important gods and goddesses
The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.The answer to your question requires an opinion and cannot be answered by a solid fact. Ancient Rome gave us so many innovations, that what would be considered important by one group of people could be considered less important by another. For example, a business executive would considered the binding nature of contracts the most important while a physician would considere fresh water from the aqueducts and indoor plumbing the most important contribution. However most people agree that the Roman concept of the principles of law were their most important legacy.
When Charlemagne was named “Emperor of the Romans,” it simultaneously symbolized Charlemagne's importance and the power of the Catholic Church. For Charlemagne, being associated with the greatness or the Roman Empire- by the Pope, no less- let all of Europe know that his power invoked the memory and legacy of Rome. For the Church, it showed people that the titles it bestowed on people still carried weight and influence.
No.
There was a great reliance on slavery
Italy, Rome, Gaul, Spain, Syria, India, China, Egypt, Arles, and Pula.
Well, if your talking about the Roman senate, than you would need to know the 2 groups in the government of Rome. The Patricians are the descendants of the founders/ancestors of Rome known as the Etruscan. Plebeians were citizens but weren't descendants of the founders of Rome. They were less important. They had limited voices, weren't as important as the Patricians and weren't being represented. So they stroked and marched out of Rome. Their request was to be equally important and be represented. They wanted to speak in the government. That is their request. If your talking about China, U.S.A. or other countries that have an emperor/king, than that would mean that those states didn't have a government.
It was not, Rome continued on till the mid 15th century. The Eastern portion of the empire split and after the west fell in the mid 5th century, the west called itself Byzantium.
The city of rome became less important.
Lincoln knew that striking a blow against slavery would make Britain and France less likely to aid the South. Also, he believed that it was important that the president rather than the antislavery Republican in Congress make the decision on ending slavery.
"Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more."
Rome does not have impressive geographic defences. It is not built on top of a sheer cliff, or an island. It is built on seven hills, which provide some high places for defence. This is less important in modern Rome. This question seems to indicate that the Rome in question is Ancient Rome. During this period, Rome's greatest defence was her legions and commanders. However, the city also had formidable wall systems which prevented an imposing obstacle.
Less than 1 mile, you can reach city of Rome.
If you fly from Anchorage, Alaska to Beijing, China, it is less than one third as far than if you were to fly from New York City to Lhasa, Tibet, China. It is important to specify the cities of origin and destination in order to derive a precise answer.
was Japan less powerful than china in 1900