The KJV is considered a good translation because it was the first mass published version of The Bible, (thanks to Gutenberg). This made it the first version to be used to spread the "gospel" around the world.
The King James Version is a translation of the Bible in English by King James I of England. It is not considered a Catholic version.
I don't understand what the question is supposed to mean. James himself was, as required by English law, Protestant, and the translation that came to be known by his name was intended for use by the Church of England (and, I suppose, the Scottish kirk... also not Roman Catholic... as well) so the phrase "King James Version for Protestants" is somewhat redundant. Also, the "King James Version" is a particular translation; so "what is the translation in the King James Version" is a question that essentially answers itself.
The New King James version is a protestant translation of the Catholic New Testament.
1611 AD.
The name "Samantha" does not appear in any translation of the Bible, including the King James Version.
The only good one is the King James Version.
The New World Translation is a TRANSLATION- it was translated from the original Hebrew and Greek, and finished in 1961. It is not a modern English paraphrase of the King James of 1611.
King James of Scotland hence the name of the King James version of the Bible.
James I was the King of Great Britain. It was published there.
King James was not a biblical character. He was the King of England when the Hampton Court Conference approved a new translation of the Bible, which was completed in 1611. This became known as the King James Version.
The word "marriage" is mentioned 43 times in 41 verses of the New International Version (a non-King James Bible translation).
its not KJB but KJV means king James version bible its a type of translation