Cursive (the 'fancy writing' you are on about) was pretty much the staple calligraphy back when it was written. Most laws, and even in some countries nowadays still write with the same style.
kind of. the Declaration of Independence was written in a fancy hand writing. I believe they used both cursive and print
Implied powers are not explicitly detailed in writing but are given by representatives. They originate from the spirit of the constitution rather than the written details.
The most basic purpose at the time for writing the US Constitution was to replace the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was also written to protect the rights of the people, and to simultaneously strengthen and limit the power of the federal government.
The US Constitution was written for the people of the US. It is written for the people by the people
The Constitution
it was written to tell the reason for writing the constitution
No. Jefferson was in France when it was written.
kind of. the Declaration of Independence was written in a fancy hand writing. I believe they used both cursive and print
The Declaration of Independence was written before the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was written after the Constitution, so when it comes to the influence on the writing of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights cannot be the correct answer. Therefore, the correct answer is the Declaration of Independence.
the framers of the constitution looked to Locke for inspiration when writing the constitution.
When the constitution was written during the summer of 1787, the Articles of Confeduration were still governing the United States.
When the constitution was written during the summer of 1787, the Articles of Confeduration were still governing the United States.
Regular handwriting is called cursive. Calligraphy is fanciful writing.
Preamble
that so not real its just your parents writing it then doing it up with some fancy mumbo jumbo!
writing to try to get the Constitution ratified as it was written, with a strong central government.
The British constitution was not written so there is no sort of documentation. So when declaring independence and creating a constitution for this "union" the colonist were used to having things in writing like their Charters, so to put it simple they wanted something tangible "documented"