Because the North was more industrial, and slavery did not fit the factory system. Industrial bosses wanted free skilled labour. They could not use resident slaves.
It was difficult to transport slaves to the North.
The economy of the South was dependent upon slave labor.
The answer is north. North is against slavery.
There was slavery in the north for the same reason there was slavery in the south, that is to work at labourous jobs.
The North never had slavery.
North Carolina was very dependent on slavery in 1653. This is how they could have the mass production of indigo, tobacco, and cotton.
Slavery was not economical in the north. Due to more extreme winters, the agricultural seasons were shortened, and the north was not so dependent on crops as income. Slavery was not as embedded as a major part of the economy.
There was some slavery, for a time, in the North, but there were more crops in the South than in the North, e.g. less need in the north.
Slavery was less successful in the north due to the fact that the north was more of a merchant society than the south was. Slavery was more "necessary" in the south because of the vast amount of farmland that was present in the south. The north however, relied more on trading/
Because the North was into manufacturing instead of agriculture as the south was.
It was difficult to transport slaves to the North.
No. North wanted to end slavery and south wanted slavery
the north did. the south had slavery, the north did not.
The economy of the South was dependent upon slave labor.
The answer is north. North is against slavery.
The South was more agricultural and less populated. The North was more industrialized and advanced and was heavily populated. The South also relied heavily on slavery and promoted it. Whilst the North did not need slavery and thought it was a horrible practice.
No. Slavery also existed in the Northern colonies before and after the American Revolution. It became less common by 1790 in the north.