yes
Well according to the pythaegoream theory, it is bcuz the Government has not mettheirneeed
Batoche.
they wanted to die
No, it had a binding contract as a part of the US.
Bacon's rebellion was justified. He thought that the government was not protecting him and everyone else from the Powhatan's and also indentured servants were not getting the land they were promised in their contract as a servant for someone for a certain amount of years.
look up William Henry Jackson on wikipedia (make sure it in the Jackson in the Northwest Rebellion) Pretty much in 1885 there was the Northwest Rebellion and Jackson was a leader with Louis Riel in it. The Northwest Rebellion is about the Metis trying to keep their rights, land and the survival of themselves.
the northwest Rebellion with Louis Riel
Louis Riel was the most vocal leader or spokesman, though there were other leaders in both rebellions.
The Red River Rebellion occurred from the fall of 1869 to the summer of 1870. The Northwest Rebellion occurred in the spring and early summer of 1885.
There were actually two uprisings led by Louis Riel in what are now Manitoba and Saskatchewan: The Red River Rebellion of 1869 and the Northwest Rebellion of 1885.
His name was Crowfoot.
The Whiskey Rebellion, which occurred in the 1790s, can be viewed as justified from the perspective of the farmers and distillers who opposed the federal excise tax on whiskey, seeing it as an unfair burden on their livelihoods. They felt that their grievances were not being heard by a distant federal government, leading to a sense of injustice. However, from the government's perspective, the rebellion threatened the rule of law and the authority of the federal government, making a strong response necessary to maintain order and unity. Ultimately, whether it was justified depends on one's views on taxation, representation, and federal authority.