Want this question answered?
Ancient Egypt had three main social classes--upper, middle, and lower. The upper class consisted of the royal family, rich landowners, government officials, important priests and army officers, and doctors. ... Ancient Egypt's class system was not rigid. People in the lower or middle class could move to a higher position.
Each social division is called a caste.
Classes in the Olmec social structure were ordered with the administrators then the engineers and builders then artists which came below the rulers in the rigid Olmec social structure. Farmers formed the society's largest and lowest class.
The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.The social classes in ancient Rome were decided by one's birth and to an extent, by one's wealth. If a person were say, a member of the proletariat and he made good business deals and acquired 40,000 sesterces, he could apply for entrance into the equite class. Roman classes were not rigid; there was always the possibility of upward mobility. Some families, such as the family of Octavian, could be appointed to a higher class as a reward for outstanding public service.
Greek Kouros figures are heavily influenced by the art of the ancient Egyptians. This is evident in their frontal, rigid postures, symmetrical proportions, and emphasis on anatomical details. The Egyptians' idealized depiction of the human form served as a major source of inspiration for the creation of Kouros sculptures in ancient Greece.
kiss my butt whats your answer
Egypt today has no rigid social structure. However, there is certainly an entitled wealthy class and the lower class of working poor which predominates in most developing nations, for which Egypt is no exception.
It is because of the Nile River, they that it was a God. ;) lol jk What I meant was that the pharaoh kept it stable.
Ancient Egypt had three main social classes--upper, middle, and lower. The upper class consisted of the royal family, rich landowners, government officials, important priests and army officers, and doctors. ... Ancient Egypt's class system was not rigid. People in the lower or middle class could move to a higher position.
This is a statement. A statement can't be answered.
It is because of the Nile River, they that it was a God. ;) lol jk What I meant was that the pharaoh kept it stable.
The farmers farmed the land, the priests ran the religion, the pharaohs ruled assisted by the nobility, the wormen bore and raised children and worked on the farms, and the slaves worked for them all.
Sparta was a city-state in ancient Greece. One of the things it's well-known for is its rigid social structure. The main religion practiced in Sparta was Greek Polytheism.
During the postclassical era in India, the caste system was primarily a rigid social system. It was characterized by strict social hierarchy and limited social mobility based on birth. This rigid structure was reinforced by religious beliefs and societal norms.
Each social division is called a caste.
cast
caste