They well trained fighters and financially well-off
yes
then the south would have a greater chance of winning the civil war
This is a matter of opinion, but the South probably had the better generals at the start of the Civil War.
The firing on Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina marked the beginning of the Civil War.
Intervention from britiain and france.
the south
The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman Empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.The winning of the second Punic war marked the beginning of the Roman empire as after their victory, Rome was ceded territories.
The British
The south lost the civil war
the union was winning the civil war
the south lost the war...
The south was winning in the East and the north was winning in the West.
yes
then the south would have a greater chance of winning the civil war
theres no until.... South Korea won the war.
It was a standoff - Athens was dominant at sea and the Peloponnesians on land.
If this is civil war related, the north won, not the south. And the north freed the slaves in the south.