Want this question answered?
Terri Schiavo case was born on 1963-12-03.
Terri Schiavo died on March 31, 2005 at the age of 41.
Only a few of the main players in the Schiavo case ever saw a living, breathing Terri Schiavo. It's true there are pictures and videos of a person that was called Terri Schiavo. But, the fact remains that not one judge [of any kind] laid eyes on a physical human being named Theresa Marie "Terri" Schindler Schiavo. The public only saw the pictures that those in the news business wanted them to see. There is no way of knowing who, if anyone, was cremated. The whole Terri Schiavo case evolved around the name 'Terri Schiavo.' The police report that was 'rewritten' 13 years after the facts, has a few provable errors. Why haven't they been corrected? There is no physical evidence that 'anyone' was starved and dehydrated to death in the state of Florida in March 2005.
The Terri Schavio case is about a mother named Terri Schavio who may have killed her children. She was found innocent and therefore did not have to go to jail.
It depends on the jurisdiction, but generally public defenders can refuse to defend a client due to a conflict of interest if it violates their professional ethics or would compromise their ability to provide zealous representation. In such cases, the court may appoint a different public defender or assign private counsel to the case.
Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)John Terry's trial (State of Ohio v. John W. Terry) was a criminal case, but the US Supreme Court case (Terry v. Ohio) involved police procedure as applied under constitutional law. Terry wasn't on trial before the Supreme Court; the Court reviewed whether Terry's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure had been violated and, if so, whether the evidence in his criminal case should have been suppressed under the Exclusionary Rule.If the the Supreme Court had held in Terry's favor, instead of Ohio's, the conviction would have been vacated and the case remanded to the trial court for a new trial, at which time it would have become a criminal case again.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
please answer this question: what is case holding in Public Health?
fourth amendment
One who prosecutes special offenses or in special situations. For example it could be that the Defendant has a conflict of interest with the prosecutor's office, judge, or other person involved in the case.
In the US Supreme Court case, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the respondent (like a defendant) in the case was the State of Ohio. John W. Terry was the petitioner or appellant (like a plaintiff).Terry was appealing his criminal conviction in People v. John W. Terry, 95 Ohio L. Abs. 321 (Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County 1964), in which Terry had been the defendant and the State of Ohio had been the plaintiff.
it works out at roughly 11.71% - although that is if interest is only applied annually, I reckon this is probably not the case though, in which case the effective interest rate would be lower.
There are no statute of limitations on any crime in the UK, if there is enough evidence to secure a conviction and it is in the 'public interest' the Crown Prosecution Service has a duty to prepare a case.