The cost of a Roman bathhouse itself was assumed by the person building he bath. Usually it was the emperor, such as the baths of Caracalla, but wealthy individuals could also build baths, such as Marcus Agrippa. The cost of using the facilities was always a nominal fee such as 1/2 of an As or no fee at all as many times emperors or owners gave the people free entrance for a length of time in order to celebrate something.
All of the Roman baths were not government funded. There were plenty of private baths and baths in homes and villas which were privately owned. Only the large imperial baths were government funded because their sheer size required a vast amount of water which could only be acquired by direct access to an aqueducts. Tapping into an aqueduct was a no-no for a private party in ancient Rome, but was okay for the government.
In ancient Rome, either very wealthy people, such as Marcus Agrippa, built baths as a gift to the Roman people or the emperors built the baths which carried their names.
This immense complex, the Baths of Caracalla, built for the citizens of Rome took only six years to construct.
No it was not.
Roman baths did not, as the question implies make things "worse". Ancient Roman baths were built first in Rome and later became a part of all large Roman cities and in cities Rome conquered that were deemed large enough to have them. Wealthy Romans often had their own private baths. Many Roman cities and conquered ones had indoor plumbing fed by waters carried in from Roman built aqueducts. Public baths were in a sense part of Roman genius and part of Roman culture. Some of the baths were fed by natural spring waters. The baths in some places were so sophisticated that they were heated. The baths were ideal for Roman citizens who could not afford private ones. The baths served not only as a place to keep clean, but were also recreational and a place for people to gather and meet.
Ancient Rome built an extensive network of aqueducts to increase access to water. These aqueducts consisted of a series of channels, tunnels, and arcades that transported water from distant sources to the city. Additionally, Rome constructed public fountains and baths to provide water for daily use and hygiene.
it is in ataria rome
Wealthier Romans paid a fee to get into the baths. Probably a few Sesterces.
This immense complex, the Baths of Caracalla, built for the citizens of Rome took only six years to construct.
anyone can answer
There was swimming in ancient Rome. The baths of Caracalla in the city of Rome had a swimming pool and so did some of the other largest Roman baths around the empire. Most people went to the baths daily.
Diocletian
Ancient Rome was built on seven hills.
It warmed homes and baths.
Ancient rome were anonymous, poorly paid workers.
They had community baths. And under the pool was a large area for fires to heat the water.
I think you mean the "parthenon". That is in Athens, not Rome. It is ancient and was built by the ancient Greeks.
The water supply for the Roman baths came from the same source as all water in Rome, the aqueducts.
the colosseum circus maximus roman baths catacombs