Because the decision showed that the Supreme Court didn't think that any State could outlaw slavery.
they said that he was a piece of property and could not sue for his freedom
Because it declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
The Dred Scott decision
The Dred Scott decision stated that people of African decent imported to America were not citizens and not protected by the Constitution. The fourteenth and fifteenth amendments nullified that decision.
14th amendment
If you're doing the crossword, the Dred Scott descision.
Roger Taney - ironically a one-tme abolitionist.
It greatly angered the Abolitionists - remembering that most Northerners were not Abolitionists by any means.
they said that he was a piece of property and could not sue for his freedom
he was angry bc his bf broke up with him that wasnt good
Because it declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Roger Taney - a too-elderly judge who (ironically) had started off as an Abolitionist
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
The Chief Justice was Roger Taney - ironically a one-time Abolitionist.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south