Want this question answered?
It depended who you were in the middle ages, if you were a king it was nice, if you were a noble than it was pretty good, if you were a knight it was okay, although you HAD to fight to the death, and if you were a serf or peasant than you were the one getting stepped on, beaten and starved.
Ninja are usually regarded as the anti-samurai. The samurai were extremely overt and colorful personalities. Their whole being depended on public display - death-defying and often death-seeking bravado. The ninja were the opposite: in order to be a spy, you have to survive and be secretive. Secretiveness was something the samurai pretended to despise, but in fact the ninja were vital to military activity. And quite often the samurai during the day doubled as ninja during the night.So could ninja be samurai at the same time?You could, theoretically. There would have been some sort of distinction, because samurai were often extremely high class, but ninja not necessarily so. But there was an overlap in the middle sooo in short yes they could
afguiuoiuiuoiu
the Barons gave land to the knights. and the knights gave land to serfs
It depended on artificial canals and irrigation.
received salaries in payment for their service
received salaries in payment for their service
Knights would have spoken the language of the region they were from, such as Old French, Middle English, or Middle High German. They likely used formal and respectful language when speaking to nobility or in official settings, while using more casual language with their peers and subordinates. Communication would have been in person, through messengers, or via written letters.
Japan was always a militant country, Samurai Warriors & Feudal systems, much as the Knights in Europe were doing the middle ages. Modern conquests began in 1894 beginning with the Sino-Japanese War.
in the middle ages there were rich and poor knights
Japan was always a militant country, Samurai Warriors & Feudal systems, much as the Knights in Europe were doing the middle ages. Modern conquests began in 1894 beginning with the Sino-Japanese War.
it depended on your rank in society
Samurai needed to use armour and weapons in order to complete their comquests
It depended who you were in the middle ages, if you were a king it was nice, if you were a noble than it was pretty good, if you were a knight it was okay, although you HAD to fight to the death, and if you were a serf or peasant than you were the one getting stepped on, beaten and starved.
Ninja are usually regarded as the anti-samurai. The samurai were extremely overt and colorful personalities. Their whole being depended on public display - death-defying and often death-seeking bravado. The ninja were the opposite: in order to be a spy, you have to survive and be secretive. Secretiveness was something the samurai pretended to despise, but in fact the ninja were vital to military activity. And quite often the samurai during the day doubled as ninja during the night.So could ninja be samurai at the same time?You could, theoretically. There would have been some sort of distinction, because samurai were often extremely high class, but ninja not necessarily so. But there was an overlap in the middle sooo in short yes they could
knights
protect the kingdom