Thieves attack traders.
No. he took the land routes to China.
Because there was a war going on in the land that would have to be crossed and the water route was dangerous because the channels that were required to enter were also controlled. They also wanted to trade with Asia.
No. Trade routes through water were dangerous (pirates, storms, etc.) Trade routes through land were also dangerous...usually due to extreme conditions (dessert, etc.)
They wanted a route to Asia. The Silk Road was long, expensive, and dangerous.
Overland routes were very dangerous, took a long time, and often merchants didn't make it back with the items they bought. It seemed better to find other ways to Asia.
because the journey over land was long and dangerous
Europeans began looking for new sea routes to Asia.
Trade routes were often dangerous. Trade routes were often dangerous.
The explorers of his time were seeking a water route to Asia. The land routes were long, dangerous, and expensive so to find a water route meant that the goods from India and China could reach Europe faster and with less expense.
European traders arrived in Southwest Asia around the first century after the birth of Jesus Christ. The Crusades would later make it difficult to trade with the Arabs and Europeans began to look for routes other than land routes.
Merchants used specific land routes to bring precious Asian spices. These merchants had the monopoly on Asian-European trade. When sea routes to Asia were discovered, Europeans had another choice of how to obtain their goods from Asia.
Its central location gave Muslim traders access to both land and sea routes between Europe and Asia.