Because the Supreme Court ruled he was still a slave even though his owner died. The North was upset by that.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
While the Dred Scott decision, which ruled a slave as property could accompany his master to a free state yet still remain a slave pleased southerners, it greatly agitated northerners. The Raid on Harperâ??s Ferry by radical abolitionist, John Brown inflamed southerners. The two incidents drew sharp divisions between the north and south and paved the way to the American Civil War.
Slaves were blocked from bringing lawsuits in courts because they weren't citizens.
It declared that slavery was protected by the Constitution, and asserted that a black man should not be allowed to sue his master.
The Dred Scott Decision helped lead to the Civil War because it caused fighting between the North and South. The North was angry because people in the north had decided not to allow slavery in their states, and the Dred Scott decision allowed slaves to be brought into their states. The Dred Scott decision basically said that if a slave was brought to a free state they were still a slave because they were property. so even a free state wasn't really free. Most southerners were happy with the decision because it allowed them to take slaves with them to free states and territories and reinforced the idea that slaves had no rights as U.S. citizens. Dred Scott's case caused more trouble between the North and South.
Many Southerners were pleased by the Dred Scott case decision because it upheld the rights of slave owners by ruling that slaves were property and not citizens, which meant they could be taken into any territory in the United States. This decision supported the expansion of slavery and protected the economic interests of slave owners in the South.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Southern states governments were pleased by the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slave owners and declared African Americans as non-citizens. This decision protected the institution of slavery and helped maintain the social and economic order in the South.
Many Southerners supported the Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into free territories. They viewed the decision as a victory for states' rights and property rights over federal power.
The South was pleased with the Dred Scott decision because it strengthened the rights of slaveowners by ruling that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens and were therefore not entitled to the rights and protections of the Constitution. This decision also reaffirmed the legality of slavery in the territories, which was a key issue that the South was concerned about.
While the Dred Scott decision, which ruled a slave as property could accompany his master to a free state yet still remain a slave pleased southerners, it greatly agitated northerners. The Raid on Harperâ??s Ferry by radical abolitionist, John Brown inflamed southerners. The two incidents drew sharp divisions between the north and south and paved the way to the American Civil War.
Slaves were blocked from bringing lawsuits in courts because they weren't citizens.
Slaves were blocked from bringing lawsuits in courts because they weren't citizens.
They believed that since slaves were their property that they could have property wherever they pleased :]
It declared that slavery was protected by the Constitution, and asserted that a black man should not be allowed to sue his master.