Sometimes it is as simple as the better army wins.
Much of Napoleon's army were untrained and not prepared for battle, plus it didn't help that his generals refused to fight.
Because he had been fightng the UK since 1793 at Toulon and he was never able to defeat them or prevent them helping their continental allies.
Much of Napoleon's army were untrained and not prepared for battle, plus it didn't help that his generals refused to fight.
He never had a Navy that could stand up to and defeat the Royal Navy.
He never had a Navy that could stand up to and defeat the Royal Navy.
Bismark was able to defeat France because they lied and used deception. They were able to win over allies by using deception and being conniving.
Napoleon was defeated because he spread his attention to wide. He tried to go after Germany (prussia) and Russia at the same time. His flaw was trying to fight Russia on Russian soil during the winter. The Russians were ahead of them and burned all the supplies as the left. The Russians were used to the cold, the Germans were not. They starved and essentially couldn't continue in the war.
A massive offensive attack by the Allies in 1918, where the Allies were able to overpower the German trenches.
In some ways they had studied and replicated his battlefield tactics and strategy. They spent more time, money and energy on training their troops and their commanders. They had learned how to apply new rules to warfare.
The purpose of the continental system was that he could sail around Europe and asia and the british was able to defeat him because the got assistance from other countries such as spain.
The fact that Britain held out against them and was then able to join with the Allies to defeat them.
how were the allies able to defeat the axis in europe Principally Britain,the US & Russia. Others, notably Australia, fought both in the European & Pacific theatres.