Nobles were unhappy with the emancipation of serfs because it diminished their economic power and control over labor. They feared losing their traditional privileges and the financial burden of compensating serfs for land that was formerly theirs. Additionally, the reform disrupted the established social hierarchy, leading to concerns about potential uprisings and loss of influence in society. Overall, the emancipation threatened their status and wealth, causing significant resentment.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Serfs are Islamic
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
There are no serfs in Russia today.
Serfs were barely above slaves themselves. I doubt any serfs ever owned slaves.
Serfs owed crops to their lords.Apex.
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
When Alexander II freed the serfs (peasants) in Russia in 1861. The serfs were never truly freed. The Russian government bought land from the landowners to give to the serfs, but the serfs were required to repay the Russian government. These repayments took 49 years and the serfs stayed on the land until it was fully repaid.
How could the Crusades change a serfs’ life?
The serfs belonged to the poor class.
The plural of the word "serf" is "serfs."