Nobles were unhappy with the emancipation of serfs because it diminished their economic power and control over labor. They feared losing their traditional privileges and the financial burden of compensating serfs for land that was formerly theirs. Additionally, the reform disrupted the established social hierarchy, leading to concerns about potential uprisings and loss of influence in society. Overall, the emancipation threatened their status and wealth, causing significant resentment.
give serf land
The noble owned the land, the farmer worked on the land.
You couldn't. Where you were born is where you stayed. Born a serf stayed a serf, born a peasant stayed a peasant, born noble stayed noble. Nobles could move to some extent if they pleased the crown, but that was it.
he raised taxes
people who worked the land were serfs and peasant witch were mostly serfs.Nobles gave the serfs some land and in return the serf would farm and protect there land for them.
Why were the nobles especially unhappy with John in 1215
king, nobles/lords, knights, peasants, serf
give serf land
he raised taxes
Serfs were slaves and not a different group of people ( serf is Latin for slave). In the middle ages there was no emancipation for these people.
give serf land
serf, nobles, kings, knights!! i think! :)
Nobles were aristocrats with power, wealth, and land ownership, while serfs were peasants bound to the land and subject to the authority of the nobles. Nobles had social status, legal privileges, and often lived in luxurious conditions, while serfs had limited rights, were tied to the land they worked on, and lived in poverty.
Stephen Langton, the Archbishop of Canterbury
King, Clergy, Nobles, Knights, Bourgeois, Peasant, Serf, Slaves
Estates run by nobles with serf labor. A mutual relationship where the noble gives protection and the serf give labor. They were more popular because of the decline of cities.
The noble owned the land, the farmer worked on the land.