Because they moved at very slow speeds, (only 4 miles per hour I believe) and they were not mass produced. Also, the enemy would try and attack them more so than on-foot soldiers, so that if they attacked the tank, and won, they could take the tank, and use it for their defending side.
They were heavy,too slow in speed about 3 or 4 mph and unable to cross trenches,narrow space 2 or 3 soldiers can sit in it and exhaust vented in the interior ,where the troops breath in it..
KANWAR
modern tanks are better than ww1 tanks in every way there faster have better armour better weapons one of the main differences is that modern tanks have a rotating turret
Yes, both world wars used tanks.
because the trench was thin and the tracks on the tanks were long the tanks simply rolled over them
Tanks were meant to break the stalemate of trench warfare
Tanks are huge killing machines. They had not been seen/used before WW1 and were both deadly and psychologically terrifying.
This was a WW1 engagement; tanks were rare in WW1. No No No Tank were not even invented in 1915 they were not even rare
No , tanks were first used in WW1 .
modern tanks are better than ww1 tanks in every way there faster have better armour better weapons one of the main differences is that modern tanks have a rotating turret
yes,all ww1 tanks had guns
Tanks were in development after WW1, mostly by Germany.
Yes, both world wars used tanks.
because the trench was thin and the tracks on the tanks were long the tanks simply rolled over them
France.
allis did
10
Gallipolli was an unsuccessful Australian attack in Turkey during WW1.
The British in WW1. A little known fact is that Henry Ford designed and built tanks.